4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Improving Medication Uptake in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples

期刊

HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION
卷 19, 期 5-6, 页码 372-377

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2010.01.010

关键词

Medication adherence; Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders; Cardiovascular disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Poor medication adherence is associated with adverse health outcomes. Improving access and adherence to pharmacological therapy is important in achieving optimal health outcomes for Indigenous populations. In spite of the impressive evidence base for cardiovascular pharmacotherapy, strategies for promoting adherence and evidence based practice are less well refined and the challenges for Indigenous populations are more pronounced. Aim: To identify factors impacting on medication adherence in Aboriginal Australians and identify solutions to improve the quality use of medicines. Method: The World Health Organization adherence model was used to classify barriers to adherence. Key elements of this model are (1) health care team/health system; (2) socio-economic factors; (3) therapy; (4) patient; and (5) condition related. Results: Entrenched socio-economic differentials aggravate challenges to medication adherence amongst Aboriginal Australians. Initiatives to promote the quality use of medicines, such as the Quality Use of Medicines Maximised for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People (QUMAX) Program, are important strategies to promote adherence. Conclusions: Medication adherence is a complex issue and addressing modifiable factors is imperative to improve health outcomes. Subsidised access to medications whether living in urban, regional, rural or remote areas is an important strategy in Closing the Gap. (Heart, Lung and Circulation 2010;19:372-377) (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc on behalf of Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据