4.4 Article

Cardiac remodeling and subcellular defects in heart failure due to myocardial infarction and aging

期刊

HEART FAILURE REVIEWS
卷 17, 期 4-5, 页码 671-681

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10741-011-9278-7

关键词

Heart failure; Myocardial infarction; Aging heart; Cardiac remodeling; Subcellular gene expression; Ca2+-handling abnormalities

资金

  1. Canada Institutes of Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although several risk factors including hypertension, cardiac hypertrophy, coronary artery disease, and diabetes are known to result in heart failure, elderly subjects are more susceptible to myocardial infarction and more likely to develop heart failure. This article is intended to discuss that cardiac dysfunction in hearts failing due to myocardial infarction and aging is associated with cardiac remodeling and defects in the subcellular organelles such as sarcolemma (SL), sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR), and myofibrils. Despite some differences in the pattern of heart failure due to myocardial infarction and aging with respect to their etiology and sequence of events, evidence has been presented to show that subcellular remodeling plays a critical role in the occurrence of intracellular Ca2+-overload and development of cardiac dysfunction in both types of failing heart. In particular, alterations in gene expression for SL and SR proteins induce Ca2+-handling abnormalities in cardiomyocytes, whereas those for myofibrillar proteins impair the interaction of Ca2+ with myofibrils in hearts failing due to myocardial infarction and aging. In addition, different phosphorylation mechanisms, which regulate the activities of Ca2+-cycling proteins in SL and SR membranes as well as Ca2+-binding proteins in myofibrils, become defective in the failing heart. Accordingly, it is suggested that subcellular remodeling involving defects in Ca2+-handling and Ca2+-binding proteins as well as their regulatory mechanisms is intimately associated with cardiac remodeling and heart failure due to myocardial infarction and aging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据