4.2 Article

Transient no reflow following primary percutaneous coronary intervention

期刊

HEART AND VESSELS
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 429-436

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00380-013-0379-1

关键词

Transient no reflow; Persistent no reflow; Myocardial infarction; Percutaneous coronary intervention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

No reflow following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a serious complication in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. No reflow in some patients is reversible (transient no reflow), whereas no reflow in others persists until the end of the procedure (persistent no reflow). The aim of this study was to identify clinical features of transient no reflow following primary PCI. Consecutive patients with no reflow (n = 123) were enrolled following primary PCI. Among them, 59 patients were in the transient group and 64 in the persistent group. We compared clinical features and hospital outcomes between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the determinants of transient no reflow. The transient group had a lower rate of in-hospital cardiac death than the persistent group (0 vs. 6.4 %, relatively, P = 0.018). There was a trend for a shorter length of hospital stay in the transient group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified initial thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 3 (OR 6.239, 95 % CI 1.727-22.541, P = 0.005) and a higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR 1.204, 95 % CI 1.006-1.440, P = 0.042) as independent predictors of transient no reflow. Transient no reflow tended to be associated with TIMI thrombus grade a parts per thousand currency sign3 (OR 2.879, 95 % CI 0.928-8.931, P = 0.067). In conclusion, initial TIMI flow grade 3 and preserved renal function were associated with recovery from no reflow. Initial angiographic finding such as TIMI flow or TIMI thrombus grade might be an important predictor of recovery from the no-reflow phenomenon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据