4.2 Article

Association of the CYBA, PPARGC1A, PPARG3, and PPARD gene variants with coronary artery disease and metabolic risk factors of coronary atherosclerosis in a Russian population

期刊

HEART AND VESSELS
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 229-236

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00380-009-1159-9

关键词

Coronary artery disease; Serum lipid profile; Association; CYBA; PPARD; Polymorphism

资金

  1. Russian Foundation of Basic Research [07-04-01032-a]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Abnormalities in lipid metabolism and enhanced oxidative stress are considered as major risk factors for coronary atherosclerosis. Functional genetic variations in genes whose products are involved in lipid metabolism and antioxidant defense could therefore modulate risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). In this study, we evaluate whether the PPARGC1A Gly482Ser, PPARG3 (-681)C/G, PPARD +294T/C, and CYBA +242C/T gene variants confer the risk of CAD in a Russian population. A total of 313 CAD patients and 132 controls with no clinical sign of CAD were studied. The polymorphic markers were tested using a TaqMan assay. Allele and genotype frequencies in CAD patients and controls were compared using the Yates chi(2) test. Association of the genetic markers with metabolic risk factors of arterial atherosclerosis was studied using the analysis of variance test and then adjusted for conventional risk factors in the multiple regression analysis. For CYBA +242C/T, both the allele T and genotype T/T showed significant association with higher risk of CAD (odds ratio =1.49 and 3.89, respectively). The allele C and genotype C/C of the +294T/C marker of PPARD were associated with increased risk of CAD providing an odds ratio of 2.12 and 2.78, respectively. The risk variants of CYBA +242C/T and PPARD +294T/C markers were associated with higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and increased total serum cholesterol, respectively. In conclusion, the CYBA +242C/T and PPARD +294T/C variants modulate risk of CAD through their associations with atherogenic serum lipid profiles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据