4.5 Article

Increased left ventricular trabeculation in highly trained athletes: do we need more stringent criteria for the diagnosis of left ventricular non-compaction in athletes?

期刊

HEART
卷 99, 期 6, 页码 401-408

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303418

关键词

-

资金

  1. CRY
  2. Club des Cardiologues du Sport
  3. French Ministry of Health and Sport
  4. British Heart Foundation [PG/11/122/29310] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To investigate the prevalence and significance of increased left ventricular (LV) trabeculation in highly trained athletes. Design Cross sectional echocardiographic study. Setting Sports cardiology institutions in the UK and France. Subjects 1146 athletes aged 14-35 years (63.3% male), participating in 27 sporting disciplines, and 415 healthy controls of similar age. The results of athletes fulfilling conventional criteria for LV non-compaction (LVNC) were compared with 75 patients with LVNC. Main outcome measure Number of athletes with increased LV trabeculation and the number fulfilling criteria for LVNC. Results Athletes displayed a higher prevalence of increased LV trabeculation compared with controls (18.3% vs 7.0%; p <= 0.0001) and 8.1% athletes fulfilled conventional criteria for LVNC. Increased LV trabeculation were more common in athletes of African/Afro-Caribbean origin. A small proportion of athletes (n=10; 0.9%) revealed reduced systolic function and marked repolarisation changes in association with echocardiographic criteria for LVNC raising the possibility of an underlying cardiomyopathy. Follow-up during the ensuing 48.6 +/- 14.6 months did not reveal adverse events. Conclusions A high proportion of young athletes exhibit conventional criteria for LVNC highlighting the non-specific nature of current diagnostic criteria if applied to elite athletic populations. Further assessment of such athletes should be confined to the small minority that demonstrate low indices of systolic function and marked repolarisation changes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据