4.5 Article

Validity of Charlson Comorbidity Index in patients hospitalised with acute coronary syndrome. Insights from the nationwide AMIS Plus registry 2002-2012

期刊

HEART
卷 100, 期 4, 页码 288-294

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304588

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss Heart Foundation
  2. Abbot AG, Switzerland
  3. Astra-Zeneca AG, Switzerland
  4. Bayer (Schweiz) AG, Switzerland
  5. Biotronik AG, Switzerland
  6. Bristol-Myers Squibb AG, Switzerland
  7. Daiichi-Sankyo/Lilly AG, Switzerland
  8. Johnson & Johnson AG-Cordis Division, Switzerland
  9. A Menarini AG, Switzerland
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme-Chibret AG, Switzerland
  11. Medtronic AG, Switzerland
  12. Pfizer AG, Switzerland
  13. St. Jude Medical, Switzerland
  14. Takeda Pharma AG, Switzerland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective This study aimed to assess the impact of individual comorbid conditions as well as the weight assignment, predictive properties and discriminating power of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) on outcome in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods A prospective multicentre observational study (AMIS Plus Registry) from 69 Swiss hospitals with 29 620 ACS patients enrolled from 2002 to 2012. The main outcome measures were in-hospital and 1-year follow-up mortality. Results Of the patients, 27% were female (age 72.1 +/- 12.6 years) and 73% were male (64.2 +/- 12.9 years). 46.8% had comorbidities and they were less likely to receive guideline-recommended drug therapy and reperfusion. Heart failure (adjusted OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.57 to 2.25), metastatic tumours (OR 2.25; 95% CI 1.60 to 3.19), renal diseases (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.60 to 2.11) and diabetes (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.19 to 1.54) were strong predictors of in-hospital mortality. In this population, CCI weighted the history of prior myocardial infarction higher (1 instead of -0.4, 95% CI -1.2 to 0.3 points) but heart failure (1 instead of 3.7, 95% CI 2.6 to 4.7) and renal disease (2 instead of 3.5, 95% CI 2.7 to 4.4) lower than the benchmark, where all comorbidities, age and gender were used as predictors. However, the model with CCI and age has an identical discrimination to this benchmark (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were both 0.76). Conclusions Comorbidities greatly influenced clinical presentation, therapies received and the outcome of patients admitted with ACS. Heart failure, diabetes, renal disease or metastatic tumours had a major impact on mortality. CCI seems to be an appropriate prognostic indicator for in-hospital and 1-year outcomes in ACS patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据