4.5 Article

Moderate overweight is beneficial and severe obesity detrimental for patients with documented atherosclerotic heart disease

期刊

HEART
卷 99, 期 9, 页码 655-660

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-303066

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Obesity is paradoxically associated with enhanced survival in patients with established cardiovascular disease. We explored this paradox further by examining the influence of obesity on survival in patients with verified atherosclerotic heart disease. Design and patients This retrospective registry based cohort study included all patients from the Western Denmark Heart Registry with coronary atherosclerosis confirmed by coronary angiography from January 2000 to December 2010. Patients were divided into eight groups according to body mass index (BMI) based on WHO BMI classification. Setting Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte, Hellerup, Denmark. Results The study included 37 573 patients (70.7% men) with a mean age of (66.3+/-11.1) years. During the 11 years of follow-up, 5866 (15.6%) patients died. Multivariable analysis confirmed that the risk of death was the lowest among the preobese patients (27.5 <= BMI<30 kg/m(2)) with adjusted HR of 0.82 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.95; p=0.008) and increased with both low (BMI<18.50 kg/m(2)) and very high (BMI=40 kg/m(2)) BMI, HR 2.04 (95% CI 1.63 to 2.57; p<0.001) and HR 1.35 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.72; p<0.01), respectively. Also the normal weight class I (18.5=BMI<23 kg/m(2)) had a significant risk of mortality HR 1.28 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.45; p<0.001). Obese classes I and II did not differ from the reference group (23=BMI<25 kg/m(2)). Conclusions Overweight atherosclerotic heart disease patients have improved survival compared with normal weight patients. Underweight and severely obese patients have increased mortality. Our results lean more towards an overweight paradox than an obesity paradox.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据