4.7 Article

Towards ultra-high peak capacities and peak-production rates using spatial three-dimensional liquid chromatography

期刊

LAB ON A CHIP
卷 15, 期 23, 页码 4415-4422

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5lc01169h

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institute for Promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT-Flanders)
  2. Research Foundation Flanders [G.0919.09, G.0.103.11.N.10]
  3. EUREKA framework [C2322.0227]
  4. Thermo Fisher Scientific

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to successfully tackle the truly complex separation problems arising from areas such as proteomics research, the development of ultra-efficient and fast separation technology is required. In spatial three-dimensional chromatography, components are separated in the space domain with each peak being characterized by its coordinates in a three-dimensional separation body. Spatial three-dimensional (3D-) LC has the potential to offer unprecedented resolving power when orthogonal retention mechanisms are applied, since the total peak capacity is the product of the three individual peak capacities. Due to parallel developments during the second-and third-dimension separations, the analysis time is greatly reduced compared to a coupled-column multi-dimensional LC approach. This communication discusses the different design aspects to create a microfluidic chip for spatial 3D-LC. The use of physical barriers to confine the flow between the individual developments, and flow control by the use of D-2 and D-3 flow distributors is discussed. Furthermore, the in situ synthesis of monolithic stationary phases is demonstrated. Finally, the potential performance of a spatial 3D-LC systems is compared with the performance obtained with stateof- the-art 1D-LC and (coupled-column) 2D-LC approaches via a Pareto-optimization approach. The proposed microfluidic device for 3D-LC featuring 16 D-2 channels and 256 D-3 channels can potentially yield a peak capacity of 8000 in a total analysis time of 10 minutes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据