4.7 Article

A cost-effective fluorescence mini-microscope for biomedical applications

期刊

LAB ON A CHIP
卷 15, 期 18, 页码 3661-3669

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5lc00666j

关键词

-

资金

  1. Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) under Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific (SSC PACIFIC) [N66001-13-C-2027]
  2. National Institutes of Health [EB012597, AR057837, DE021468, HL099073, R56AI105024]
  3. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE)
  4. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [SFRH/BD/51679/2011]
  5. Office of Naval Research Young National Investigator Award
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/51679/2011] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have designed and fabricated a miniature microscope from off-the-shelf components and a webcam, with built-in fluorescence capability for biomedical applications. The mini-microscope was able to detect both biochemical parameters, such as cell/tissue viability (e.g. live/dead assay), and biophysical properties of the microenvironment such as oxygen levels in microfabricated tissues based on an oxygen-sensitive fluorescent dye. This mini-microscope has adjustable magnifications from 8-60x, achieves a resolution as high as < 2 mu m, and possesses a long working distance of 4.5 mm (at a magnification of 8x). The mini-microscope was able to chronologically monitor cell migration and analyze beating of microfluidic liver and cardiac bioreactors in real time, respectively. The mini-microscope system is cheap, and its modularity allows convenient integration with a wide variety of pre-existing platforms including, but not limited to, cell culture plates, microfluidic devices, and organs-on-a-chip systems. Therefore, we envision its widespread application in cell biology, tissue engineering, biosensing, microfluidics, and organs-on-chips, which can potentially replace conventional bench-top microscopy where long-term in situ and large-scale imaging/analysis is required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据