4.5 Article

Three-dimensional characteristics of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: a real-time three-dimensional colour Doppler echocardiography study

期刊

HEART
卷 94, 期 5, 页码 590-596

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2007.119123

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: We sought to evaluate the three-dimensional (3D) features of functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and their geometric determinants by real-time 3D colour Doppler echocardiography. Methods: Real-time 3D colour Doppler echocardiography was performed in 52 patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. With aliasing velocity set around 40 cm/s, proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) radius was measured on medial, central and lateral antero-posterior planes at a mid-systole frame, and the largest (PISAmax) was determined. Geometric investigations of the left ventricle and mitral valve were performed. Results: The distal length from the anterior leaflet angulation on the central plane was significantly longer in the 29 patients (56%) with eccentric PISA than in the 23 patients with central PISA (1.73 (0.44) vs 1.47 (0.33) cm, p < 0.05). The 18 patients (35%) with both-sides dominant PISA had a smaller anterior leaflet bending angle (141 degrees (8 degrees) vs 147 degrees (8 degrees), p < 0.05) and a longer distal length from the angulation on the central plane (1.80 (0.36) vs 1.51 (0.41) cm, p < 0.05) than the remaining 34 patients. The 14 patients (27%) with separate PISAs had smaller PISAmax (0.33 (0.13) vs 0.45 (0.16) cm, p < 0.05), and tenting height (0.91 (0.20) vs 1.06 (0.24) cm, p < 0.05) and tenting area (2.1 (0.6) vs 2.7 (0.8) cm(2), p < 0.05) on the central plane than in those with single PISA. Conclusions: 3D features of FMR are quite diverse. The shape and site of anterior leaflet bending determine the shape of the regurgitant orifice, and small mitral valve tenting generates separate small regurgitant orifices of FMR in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据