4.4 Article

Methods for Constructing and Assessing Propensity Scores

期刊

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 5, 页码 1701-1720

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12182

关键词

Observational data/quasi-experiments; administrative data uses; patient outcomes/function

资金

  1. NCI/NINR [5R01CA116227]
  2. National Palliative Care Research Center
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs HSRD CDA [11-201/CDP 12-255]
  4. National Institute on Aging [1K23AG040774-01A1, K24 AG022345]
  5. American Federation for Aging Research
  6. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Clinical Research Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. To model the steps involved in preparing for and carrying out propensity score analyses by providing step-by-step guidance and Stata code applied to an empirical dataset. Study Design. Guidance, Stata code, and empirical examples are given to illustrate (1) the process of choosing variables to include in the propensity score; (2) balance of propensity score across treatment and comparison groups; (3) balance of covariates across treatment and comparison groups within blocks of the propensity score; (4) choice of matching and weighting strategies; (5) balance of covariates after matching or weighting the sample; and (6) interpretation of treatment effect estimates. Empirical Application. We use data from the Palliative Care for Cancer Patients (PC4C) study, a multisite observational study of the effect of inpatient palliative care on patient health outcomes and health services use, to illustrate the development and use of a propensity score. Conclusions. Propensity scores are one useful tool for accounting for observed differences between treated and comparison groups. Careful testing of propensity scores is required before using them to estimate treatment effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据