4.4 Article

The Effectiveness of Implementing an Electronic Health Record on Diabetes Care and Outcomes

期刊

HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
卷 47, 期 4, 页码 1522-1540

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01370.x

关键词

Electronic health records; diabetes; quality of care

资金

  1. American Diabetes Association [1-09-CR-05]
  2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) [1R21HS020696-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To assess the impact of electronic health record (EHR) implementation on primary care diabetes care. Data Sources Charts were abstracted semi-annually for 14,051 diabetes patients seen in 34 primary care practices in a large, fee-for-service network from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2010. The study sample was limited to patients aged 40 years or older. Study Design A naturalistic experiment in which GE Centricity Physician OfficeEMR 2005 was rolled out over a staggered 3-year schedule. Data Collection Chart audits were conducted using the AMA/Physician Consortium Adult Diabetes Measure set. The primary outcome was the HealthPartners optimal care measure: HbA1c = 8 percent; LDL cholesterol < 100 mg/dl; blood pressure < 130/80 mmHg; not smoking; and documented aspirin use in patients =40 years of age. Principal Findings After adjusting for patient age, sex, and insulin use, patients exposed to the EHR were significantly more likely to receive optimal care when compared with unexposed patients (p < .001), with an estimated difference of 9.20 percent (95% CI: 6.08, 12.33) in the final year between exposed patients and patients never exposed. Components of the optimal care bundle showing positive improvement after adjustment were systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure <130 mmHg, aspirin prescription, and smoking cessation. Among patients exposed to EHR, all process and outcome measures except HbA1c and lipid control showed significant improvement. Conclusion Implementation of a commercially available EHR in primary care practice may improve diabetes care and clinical outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据