4.3 Article

Characterization of personal RF electromagnetic field exposure and actual absorption for the general public

期刊

HEALTH PHYSICS
卷 95, 期 3, 页码 317-330

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.HP.0000318880.16023.61

关键词

electromagnetic fields; exposure; population; exposure; radiofrequency; radiation; non-ionizing

资金

  1. FWO-V (Research Foundation-Flanders)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, personal electromagnetic field exposure of the general public due to 12 different radiofrequency sources is characterized. Twenty-eight different realistic exposure scenarios based upon time, environment, activity, and location have been defined and a relevant number of measurements were performed with a personal exposure meter. Indoor exposure in office environments can be higher than outdoor exposure: 95th percentiles (if field values due to WiFi ranged from 0.36 to 0.58 V m(-1), and for DECT values of 0.33 V m(-1) were measured. The downlink signals of GSM and DCS caused the highest outdoor exposures tip to 0.52 V m(-1). The highest total field exposure occurred for mobile scenarios (inside a train or bus) from uplink signals of GSM and DCS (e.g., mobile phones) due to changing environmental conditions', handovers, and higher required transmitted signals from mobile phones due to penetration through windows while moving. A method to relate the exposure to the actual whole-body absorption in the human body is proposed. An application is shown where the actual absorption in a human body model due to a GSM downlink signal is determined. Fiftieth, 95th, and 99th percentiles of the whole-body specific absorption rate (SAR) due to this GSM signal of 0.58 mu W kg(-1), 2.08 mu W kg(-1), and 5.01 mu W kg(-1) are obtained for a 95th percentile of 0.26 V m(-1). A practical usable function is proposed for the relation between the whole-body SAR and the electric fields. The methodology of this paper enables epidemiological studies to make an analysis in combination with both electric field and actual whole-body SAR values and to compare exposure with basic restrictions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据