4.4 Article

A bid decision-making model in the initial bidding phase for overseas construction projects

期刊

KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
卷 20, 期 4, 页码 1189-1200

出版社

KOREAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-KSCE
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-015-0760-y

关键词

bidding international construction projects; sunk cost; bid decision-making model; project factor; correlation analysis; logistic regression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, the award of overseas construction projects to Korean construction companies has substantially increased, and the number of Korean bids to win such projects has grown significantly also. Overseas project bidding characteristically requires a higher resource input cost in the initial preparation phase than does domestic project bidding. However, the bidding process of construction companies is frequently suspended for various reasons, and hence the opportunity cost associated with the bidding process becomes a sunk cost which, in turn, puts the bidder at a further loss. Therefore, by identifying projects with the highest chance of proceeding up to the final bid submission in the early phase of bidding, the sunk cost that results from a bid drop or suspension can be reduced and the projects with high bid probabilities can be targeted to enhance order possibility and performance capability. Unfortunately, many contractors tend to rely on qualitative assessments based on their past experiences and intuition, or on the Chief Executive Officers' (CEO) subjective instructions, when making a bid decision. In this respect, this study proposes a model utilizing the logistic regression method, analyzing the correlation between various factors of project and bid decision making to increase the effectiveness of future decision making. If factors relating to the internal decision-making process of a construction company and overseas bidding process are coordinated, the bidders can be expected to enhance the reliability of their decisions using this model, and the cost incurred during a bidding process may be reduced.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据