相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。Deriving distributional weights for QALYs through discrete choice experiments
Emily Lancsar et al.
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS (2011)
Severity as an independent determinant of the social value of a health service
Jeff R. J. Richardson et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS (2011)
Weighting and valuing quality-adjusted life-years using stated preference methods: preliminary results from the Social Value of a QALY Project
R. Baker et al.
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (2010)
A COMPARISON OF PATIENT AND GENERAL POPULATION WEIGHTINGS OF EQ-5D DIMENSIONS
Rachel Mann et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2009)
The predictive validity of prospect theory versus expected utility in health utility measurement
Jose Maria Abellan-Perpinan et al.
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS (2009)
Editorial: Moving the QALY Forward or Just Stuck in Traffic?
F. Reed Johnson
VALUE IN HEALTH (2009)
Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people
Joanna Coast et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE (2008)
Developing methods that really do value the 'Q' in the QALY
Paul Dolan
HEALTH ECONOMICS POLICY AND LAW (2008)
Interpretations of utility and their implications for the valuation of health
Paul Dolan et al.
ECONOMIC JOURNAL (2008)
Is there a case for using visual analogue scale valuations in cost-utility analysis?
David Parkin et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2006)
Developing attributes for a generic quality of life measure for older people: Preferences or capabilities?
I Grewal et al.
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE (2006)
Can we estimate the 'social' value of a QALY? Four core issues to resolve
RD Smith et al.
HEALTH POLICY (2005)
QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature
P Dolan et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2005)
Lack of multiplicative transitivity in person trade-off responses
M Schwarzinger et al.
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2004)
A new explanation for the difference between time trade-off utilities and standard gamble utilities
H Bleichrodt
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2002)
Making descriptive use of prospect theory to improve the prescriptive use of expected utility
H Bleichrodt et al.
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE (2001)