4.5 Article

MARKETWATCH Choosing The Best Hospital: The Limitations Of Public Quality Reporting

期刊

HEALTH AFFAIRS
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 1680-1687

出版社

PROJECT HOPE
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1680

关键词

-

资金

  1. Doris Duke Clinical Scientist Development Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The call for accountability in health care quality has fueled the development of consumer-oriented Web sites that provide hospital ratings. Taking the consumer perspective, we compared five Web sites to assess the level of agreement in their rankings of local hospitals for four diagnoses. The sites assessed different measures of structure, process, and outcomes and did not use consistent patient definitions or reporting periods. Consequently, they failed to agree on hospital rankings within any diagnosis, even when using the same metric (such as mortality). In their current state, rating services appear likely to confuse, rather than inform, consumers. [Health Affairs 27, no. 6 (2008): 1680-1687; 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1680]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据