4.5 Article

Serotonin Depletion Increases Nociception-Evoked Trigeminal NMDA Receptor Phosphorylation

期刊

HEADACHE
卷 49, 期 3, 页码 375-382

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2009.01341.x

关键词

low serotonin; NMDA receptor phosphorylation; trigeminal nociception; dural inflammation; migraine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective.-To investigate the effect of serotonin depletion on phosphorylation and expression of NR1 subunit of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor in trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC), and on trigeminal nociception evoked by dural inflammation. Background.-Migraine is associated with low serotonin condition and an increased neuronal excitability. NMDA receptor is implicated in central plasticity change that leads to neural sensitization. Alteration in NMDA receptor phosphorylation or expression in TNC may be responsible for increased trigeminal nociception in serotonin-depleted state. Methods.-Adult male Wistar rats were separated into normal and low serotonin groups. Serotonin was depleted by intraperitoneal injection with para-chlorophenylalanine 3 days before the experiment. Trigeminal nociception was induced by applying inflammatory soup on exposed dura. Two hours after induction, phosphorylated NR1, NR1, and Fos expressions were studied in TNC by immunohistochemistry. Results.-Dural application of inflammatory soup led to the activation of trigeminal nociceptive system as well as the phosphorylation of NR1, which were further enhanced in the low serotonin condition. There was a strong relationship between NR1 phosphorylation and trigeminal nociception. However, neither meningeal inflammation nor serotonin depletion altered NR1 expression. Conclusions.-Low serotonin condition facilitates dural inflammation-induced NR1 phosphorylation and trigeminal nociception. It is suggested that the mechanism of nociceptive facilitation in serotonin-depleted state may involve the increase in NR1 phosphorylation rather than the upregulation of NR1 subunit of NMDA receptor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据