4.6 Article

Physiological regulation of Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii (Nostocales, Cyanobacteria) in response to inorganic phosphorus limitation

期刊

HARMFUL ALGAE
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 53-58

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2011.11.005

关键词

Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii; Extracellular phosphatase; Inorganic phosphorus (Pi); Physiological regulation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30800123, 31170372]
  2. State Key Basic Research and Development Plan of China [2008CB418000]
  3. China SWU [SWU110065]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Physiological responses to varying dissolved inorganic phosphorus (DIP) levels were examined to explore the acclimation mechanisms of Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii, a nontoxic diazotrophic cyanobacterium. The results showed that the growth rate of C. raciborskii was markedly reduced under phosphorus (P)-deficient conditions. Photosynthetic activity in terms of F-v/F-m (maximum quantum yield), ETRmax (maximum electron transport rate), alpha (photosynthetic efficiency) and I-k (saturation irradiance) was also found to be significantly lower after a 12-day incubation with a Pi concentration of less than 0.05 mg L-1. When supplied with phosphorus concentrations of more than 0.50 mg L-1, C raciborskii showed increased growth rates and reached a relatively stable value, about 0.26 d(-1). Additionally, the content of malodialdehyde (MDA), a lipid peroxidation product reflecting the destruction of lipid membrane by environmental stresses, in Cylindrospermopsis cultured with a low P concentration was 10.81-12.13 times higher than that with a high P concentration. The relative activities of catalase (CAT) and extracellular phosphatase (APA) were found to increase significantly to reduce the stress of P limitation and compensate for P deficiency. These data indicate that C. raciborskii is able to regulate its physiological metabolism in order to acclimate to low ambient DIP environments. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据