4.6 Article

Phylogenetic relationships in the harmful dinoflagellate Cochlodinium polykrikoides (Gymnodiniales, Dinophyceae) inferred from LSU rDNA sequences

期刊

HARMFUL ALGAE
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 271-277

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2007.12.003

关键词

Cochlodinium fulvescens; Cochlodinium polykrikoides; distribution; HAB; LSU rDNA; phylogeny

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phylogenetic relationships among chain-forming Cochlodinium species, including the harmful red tide forming dinoflagellate Cochlodinium polykrikoides, were investigated using specimens collected from coastal waters of Canada, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Philippines, Puerto Rico, and USA. The phylogenetic tree inferred from partial (D1-D6 regions) large subunit ribosomal RNA gene (LSU rDNA) sequences clearly differentiated between C polykrikoides and a recently described species, Cochlodinium fulvescens. Two samples collected from the Pacific coasts of North America (British Columbia, Canada and California, USA) having typical morphological characters of C fulvescens such as the sulcus located in the intermediate region of the cingulum, were closely related to C fulvescens from western Japan in the phylogenetic tree. Cochlodinium polykrikoides formed a monophyletic group positioned as a sister group of the C fulvescens clade with three well-supported sub-clades. These three clades were composed of (1) East Asian, including specimens collected from Hong Kong, western Japan, and southern Korea, (2) Philippines, from Manila Bay, Philippines and Omura Bay, Japan, and (3) Americart/Malaysian, from the Atlantic coasts of USA, the Pacific coast of Mexico, Puerto Rico, and Borneo Island, Malaysia. Each of these clades is considered to be a so-called ribotype representing the population inhabiting each region, which is distinguished based on ribosomal RNA gene sequences in the species despite similarities in their morphological characters, (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据