4.3 Article

Practical and cost-effective measurement of B-domain deleted and full-length recombinant FVIII in the routine haemostasis laboratory

期刊

HAEMOPHILIA
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 E133-E138

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/hae.12093

关键词

factor VIII; FVIII chromogenic substrate assay; FVIII one-stage assay; haemophilia A; recombinant FVIII; Refacto-AF Laboratory Standard

资金

  1. Pfizer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The assessment of recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) activity (FVIII:C) in plasma of patients is dependent on the assay. Notably, a calibration with a product-specific laboratory standard is recommended when measuring Refacto-AFR activity in plasma with a one-stage assay. The objective of this study was to facilitate the measurement of rFVIII, taking into account the recent demonstration that a calibration curve does not have to be included in each run. FVIII:C was measured in patients' samples after infusion of different types of rFVIII with a one-stage and a chromogenic assay calibrated either with pooled normal plasma or a product-specific laboratory standard. Results obtained with the one-stage coagulation assay were compared with these provided by a chromogenic assay. We confirmed that a calibration curve can be used for a prolonged period of time without loss of precision and accuracy. In such conditions, a stable relation between the calibration curves generated with a product-specific laboratory standard and plasma can be established. In patients' plasma, Refacto-AF levels measured with a one-stage FVIII assay calibrated with plasma or a product-specific laboratory standard diverged from 58% to 17% and from 25% to +18%, respectively, from the activity determined with a chromogenic substrate assay. By comparison, FVIII:C levels of full-length rFVIII measured with the one-stage assay calibrated with plasma were 649% lower than with the chromogenic assay. In a monocentric setting, the long-term stability of the calibration curves allows the implementation of a practical and cost-effective approach to determine rFVIII:C levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据