4.3 Review

The effect of cooling on coagulation and haemostasis: Should Ice be part of treatment of acute haemarthrosis in haemophilia?

期刊

HAEMOPHILIA
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 843-850

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02918.x

关键词

coagulation; cryotherapy; haemarthrosis; haemophilia; haemostasis; ice

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Repeated haemarthroses and the consequences of blood in the joint contribute to blood induced joint disease (BIJD) in people with haemophilia (PWH). Prevention of bleeding, through medical management, is the standard of care in developed countries, but is not universally available due to financial and other barriers. Ice application, as part of R.I.C.E. (Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation) or alone, is commonly recommended as an adjunct treatment to decrease bleeding, pain, tissue metabolism, oedema, and inflammation. This article will review evidence regarding local cooling by commonly used ice application methods, to decrease the temperature of the skin and intra-articular (IA) joint space and the resultant effects on haemostasis and coagulation. The general literature was reviewed for articles in English describing temperatures achievable in the skin and IA space using clinically relevant ice protocols, and the effect of cooling on haemostasis and coagulation. The literature demonstrates that typical methods of ice application can cool both the skin and IA space. Published, general literature studies have also consistently demonstrated that experimental cooling of blood and/or tissue, both in vitro and in vivo in humans and in animal models, can significantly impair coagulation and prolong bleeding. In PWH with acute haemarthrosis, ice application has potential to increase haemorrhage morbidity by further impairing coagulation and haemostasis. Ice has not been shown to improve overall outcome, stop bleeding nor swelling from haemarthrosis. Although ice can help manage acute, haemarthrosis-related pain, there are other available interventions that will not impair coagulation and haemostasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据