4.3 Article

Sequential combined bypassing therapy is safe and effective in the treatment of unresponsive bleeding in adults and children with haemophilia and inhibitors

期刊

HAEMOPHILIA
卷 17, 期 4, 页码 630-635

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02467.x

关键词

bypassing agents; haemophilia; inhibitors; surgery; therapy; unresponsive bleeds

资金

  1. Baxter
  2. Wyeth/Pfizer
  3. NovoNordisk
  4. Biotest

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Some 10-20% of bleeding events in haemophilia patients with high-responding inhibitors cannot be controlled with bypassing agents. However, sequential combined bypassing therapy (SCBT) has been reported to be successful in five children. To extend this observation, a survey was undertaken by the European Haemophilia Treatment Standardisation Board (EHTSB) in children and adults. Data were collected from all centres belonging to the EHTSB network by a retrospective medical record review. SCBT courses were defined as the administration of both recombinant activated factor VIIa (rFVIIa) and activated prothrombin complex concentrate (APCC) within 12 h. A web-based database was prepared to collect data on SCBT courses in a standardized and anonymous manner from patients' files. Eleven inhibitor patients underwent SCBT (nine haemophilia A; two haemophilia B). Two children had refractory knee haemarthrosis and one, an unresponsive calf haematoma. Five adults had significant bleeds following major surgery, one had lower limb compartmental syndrome and one a post-traumatic upper limb haematoma and haemarthrosis. SCBT administration alternated one APCC dose to 1-3 rFVIIa doses: dosing intervals ranged between 3 and 6 h; APCC (20-80 U kg(-1)) was given every 8-12 h; rFVIIa (90-270 mu g kg(-1)) was given every 3-12 h. Bleeding control was achieved in 12-24 h in all patients. SCBT was discontinued after 1-15 days. No clinical adverse events were observed, but a significant increase in D-dimer levels was seen in three/five patients who were assessed. SCBT was efficacious without adverse events; nevertheless, due to potential risks, it remains a salvage treatment. A prospective clinical trial is needed to provide further evidence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据