葡萄不愤怒 2022-10-25

10.05 submitted
10.13 peer reviewed once
10.18 became "with editor"
It hasn't changed since then until today. Is there still a chance?

平常昕 2022-10-25

2022.9.4 submitted
2022.9.6 with editor
2022.9.9 in peer review
2022.10.7 minor revision
2022.10.19 revision submitted
2022.10.20 accepted

Translated into English:

September 4th, 2022: Submitted
September 6th, 2022: Under review by editor
September 9th, 2022: In peer review
October 7th, 2022: Minor revision required
October 19th, 2022: Revised submission
October 20th, 2022: Accepted

simitkxj 2022-10-09

8.24 submitted
9.11 Major revision
9.26 Minor revision
10.9 Accepted

QAAQ 2022-09-26

9.21接收 translates to "September 21st, received."

ajkdajkld 2022-09-23

Which level of journal did you submit to?

QAAQ 2022-09-20

2022.9.15, revised

Anboyu 2022-09-12

Switched to another journal of the same level, the revised manuscript has now been accepted within a month.

xfl 2022-08-26

2022.7.5 submitted
2022.7.9 with editor
2022.7.11 in peer review
2022.8.16 major revision
2022.8.23 resubmitted
in peer review
2022.8.25 accepted
JMCC's editing efficiency is really high. Except for the slightly longer initial review time (40 days), it did not delay the authors' time at all. The revised manuscript was checked by the editorial department and sent to the editor on the same day, who directly sent it for review. It was accepted in less than two days.

一支蕉 2022-08-15

2022.5.25 Submission
2022.7.04 Major revision
2022.7.21 Resubmission
2022.8.10 Accepted for publication
Overall, both the editors and reviewers were very efficient. The first paper from our research group in JMCC, we are very happy~ Wishing JMCC continued success and an early return to the top tier journals!

Anboyu 2022-08-09

2022.7.29 Submission
2022.8.1 with editor
2022.8.6 Rejected without review
Reason given in a simple sentence: Lack of innovation and impact. I believed that the article was quite original, well-structured, and followed the template strictly. I even spent a hundred dollars to check for plagiarism on the official website, and there were no issues. However, it was rejected without even being reviewed.

QAAQ 2022-08-04

2022.08.01 Major Renovation.

溪落3 2022-08-01

I don't know how long it will take to know the results of the review comments I submitted on the 19th. It still shows that it is in the hands of the reviewers. I don't know if I should ask about it. It's so agonizing, it has been this long and there is still no progress.

康师傅冰红茶 2022-08-01

Reply to the editorial comments two weeks later.

溪落3 2022-07-30

It has been a long time since the reviewers submitted their comments. There were not just two, but possibly three or even four reviewers. For example, if there is one rejection and one minor revision, a third reviewer will be required to decide whether to make revisions or reject the manuscript. In my case, there are three reviewers, so the review process is slow. It has been almost half a month since I submitted the revised manuscript, but there is still no progress. I can only wait.

Snowarb 2022-07-30

The article review is taking so long, it has been almost two months, and it has been in peer review all this time. Praying to receive a reply soon!

leoliuyb 2022-07-28

JMCA suggests transferring over and working on components and sensors. After transferring on May 6, there were several cycles between peer review and the editor, which delayed the process and took about a month for official review.
On July 4, two review comments were received, requiring minor revisions.
On July 15, the revised manuscript was resubmitted.
On July 27, it was accepted.
Overall, the efficiency of the editor and reviewers can be considered quite fast.
This is the first SCI paper.

溪落3 2022-07-27

Just curious, how long does it usually take to receive feedback on the revised draft? It's been ten days since I responded to the comments for major revisions, and it's still in the hands of the reviewer.

QAAQ 2022-07-23

Record the status of the manuscript:
Submitted on June 24, 2022, and then changed between "with editor" and "in peer review".

cqustcg 2022-07-15

Submitted on 7.3, more than 10 days have passed, and it is still in the hands of the associate editor. I wonder how long it will take for it to be reviewed? It feels quite slow! How long did it take for yours to be reviewed? Thank you.

康师傅冰红茶 2022-07-14

During the process, there was a major revision. Thanks to the editor, Unyong Jeong, and the reviewers.

石神 2022-07-12

Record
2022.7.12
WITH EDITORIAL OFFICE
Good luck.

Liao1999 2022-06-29

I don't know who the editor is. I don't know how much longer this state will last.

Liao1999 2022-06-29

5.27 submitted means that something was submitted on May 27th.
6.29 In peer review means that something is currently undergoing the process of being reviewed by peers.

学术羊 2022-06-28

6.28 in peer review translates to "June 28th in peer review."

Samtines 2022-06-23

5.17 In peer review

Samtines 2022-06-23

5.6 Submitted
5.8 With editor
5.9 In peer review
5.16 With editor
5.29 Minor Revision
6.5 Resubmitted
6.6 With editor
6.7 In peer review
6.23 Accepted
Overall, it was quite quick. The editor of JMCC was responsible and efficient. However, I'm not sure why it took over ten days for the minor revision to be accepted. Maybe the reviewers didn't see the email. I wish everyone a smooth acceptance.

学术羊 2022-06-20

6.20 in peer review translates to "6.20 is the score achieved in the process of peer review."

学术羊 2022-06-19

6.19 in peer review means that a certain document or research paper is currently undergoing evaluation by experts in the same field before it can be officially published or accepted.

学术羊 2022-06-18

6.18 in peer review translates to "June 18th in peer review."

溪落3 2022-06-17

Thanks, older brother. Goodbye and take care. I hope we both succeed. Maybe the teacher didn't tell me. Thank you very much.