lcx15510 2021-05-14

Excuse me, have you encountered a situation where you cannot find a reviewer? I submitted my manuscript three days ago and was informed that no reviewer could be found. It has been 10 days now, and I still haven't received any updates.

yangshujian 2021-05-12

The assigned academic editors, chief editors, and reviewers are generally responsible. Submitted on February 28th, returned for format revision on March 9th, received major revisions on April 29th, but the overall feedback was positive, with only 6 issues raised. Accepted on May 12th.

uohcyaj 2021-04-25

Speak a fair word, the upper part of the Atmosphere journal has some guest editors who are scientists endorsing it, and the quality is acceptable, not as mediocre as many other genuine water journals. People's credibility is the most valuable, much stronger than bureaucratic institutions. You can easily search on the internet, and many guest editors are indeed influential scientists.

The reason why zky is included in the warning list is because people are afraid of becoming famous, just like how pigs fear getting fat! zky's own flagship journal (without naming it) struggled to increase its impact factor over the years through commissioned articles, promotion, and citations, and it has only reached a little over 2. So, what does it mean for your Atmosphere journal to have an impact factor of just over 2 but still be so efficient? Who are the decision-makers in China? Just take a look at zky's standards, they are only set by a few individuals. The principles for top journals are: 1) recognized as good journals by the public, and 2) a journal where insiders can frequently publish their work.