jjj 2023-07-03

I am very fast here! The reception is going smoothly, and now the impact factor is over 7.

LH 2023-06-28

It has increased, the impact factor is now 7.5.

cxj123 2023-05-27

The review speed is very fast, and the state of work on weekends also changes, indicating that they still work on weekends. They are really efficient. There were two review comments, one suggesting minor revisions and the other suggesting rejection. In the end, they gave a deadline of one month for the minor revisions, which is impressive. After completing the revisions, the paper was accepted quickly. It's a good domestic journal, and its impact factor is steadily rising. It shows that the journal is working hard to build a good journal in China. Keep up the good work!

LH 2022-10-03

The editor is Professor Dong, the associate editor.
Submitted on June 25, 2022.
Review comments received on July 27, 2022.
Revised on August 5, 2022.
Accepted on October 3, 2022.
The journal happened to be working on a special issue on two-dimensional materials, so I submitted it.

Although I don't know anyone in the journal, it went relatively smoothly.

rvoice 2022-08-30

Which editor handled this? I saw online that it would be accepted within two months.

zmrright 2022-08-12

It still feels very fast...

荣神益人---是光是盐 2022-07-21

The translation of the text into English is: "It has a fast speed, steadily increasing journal impact, and a rapidly increasing impact factor. It is a very good journal."

optics 皮卡丘 2022-03-18

This journal's impact factor is not high, it's just boosted by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. It's actually very mediocre.

PHYQHD 2022-03-17

This journal is so trashy, and the editors are very irresponsible. I submitted my manuscript over three months ago, and the status of the review has not been updated since the day of submission. I politely emailed to inquire about the status of my manuscript, only to receive a rejection letter without any external review. The rejection comments provided by the editor were very amateurish and unprofessional. If they intended to reject it without an external review, they should have done it earlier and not waste the author's time for so long.