认证评论 - Nature Communications
二木小丫 2023-03-10
The editing started on 3/1, and there has been no response until now.
我不是科研狗 2023-03-10
It seems like the editor is very interested in your work, but it is very rare for them to reject after requesting major revisions.
lydx 2023-03-09
After review, two reviewers had different opinions. One believed that the quality was too low and strongly recommended rejecting the submission, while the other suggested major revisions. It is also necessary to thank the editor, who ultimately decided to give the opportunity for major revisions.
我不是科研狗 2023-03-09
Can you talk about the precautions for the return process?
一夜很静 2023-03-09
What else is there to communicate if you have been rejected?
我不是科研狗 2023-03-09
Does anyone have any experience of having their submission rejected? Let's exchange and discuss it together.
leeroket 2023-03-08
May I ask how the progress is going now? Is the review process fast?
Longfor 2023-03-06
There are a total of three reviewers. Thank you to all the reviewers for their high efficiency.
一夜很静 2023-03-04
You reviewed twice, generally taking around ten days each time. Why so fast? May I ask how many reviewers are there in total?
Longfor 2023-02-27
This journal has a fast manuscript processing speed and a large publication volume, with the ability to publish seven thousand articles per year. The requirements for the journal are relatively high, after all, it is a Nature sub-journal.
Submission progress:
2022.09.16 Manuscript submitted (first round)
2022.09.21 Contacting potential reviewers
2022.10.11 All reviewers assigned
2022.10.21 Review complete
2022.12.08 Manuscript submitted (second round)
2022.12.12 All reviewers assigned
2022.12.23 Review complete
2023.01.07 Manuscript submitted (final round)
2023.01.10 Manuscript Accepted
2023.01.20 Published online
晴天娃娃2022 2023-02-19
Okay, received, thank you!
毛毛家的 2023-02-13
Hello, after contacting potential reviewers from 1-4, there was a blank stage from 1-19. Then, it changed back to "under consideration" on 1-29. May I ask what is going on? Are they still contacting reviewers? It is now 2-23 and "all reviewers assigned" has not appeared yet.
zzzzz11 2023-02-11
Submitted on January 2nd, reviewed after 6 days, received the review comments today. There were 2 reviewers, one positive and one neutral. The reviewers are extremely professional and highly regarded in their field. The editor has granted 3 months for revisions.
molish 2023-02-04
Approximately 26 days to start looking for reviewers, 29 days to find all the reviewers. It should be ready for review.
molish 2023-02-04
I started looking for reviewers approximately 26 days ago and finished finding reviewers on day 29.
molish 2023-02-04
Indeed, the system will be updated. Contacting Potential Reviewers. And an email will be sent to request a reporting summary.
三毛二 2023-02-03
It was submitted on January 31st and took 23 days from submission to review.
Weijun Xiu 2023-01-31
First-time submissions are not required, but selective acceptance in the future will specifically require you to upload vector graphics.
尔东 2023-01-31
My internet speed is also super slow. How is the situation now, OP?
xujianhua 2023-01-24
Excuse me, have you submitted it for review? Mine is "under consideration" since January 5th, 2022, and there has been no change until now. In the past, decisions were made within 10 days at most.
毛毛家的 2023-01-20
Can the original poster share the timeline for submitting the manuscript? I see that the stage column is blank from 1-19. I'm not sure what's going on.
三毛二 2023-01-19
It has been the same state for more than 10 days... Anxious.
晴天娃娃2022 2023-01-19
Understood, okay, thank you!
Secret 2023-01-19
I have been rejected by NS and Sci Adv in succession. Losing patience, I submitted to NC and after one round of revisions, it was accepted. All three opinions were very positive and easy to respond to.
lydx 2023-01-18
No need for initial review, only required after acceptance. And you have to fill in a lot of content, about 20 pages in Word.
晴天娃娃2022 2023-01-18
I would like to ask a question to the experts. Is it necessary for the images in the first submission of NC to be high-definition vector graphics, or can regular images be used? Should the images only be modified into vector graphics after acceptance? Thank you!
晴天娃娃2022 2023-01-18
May I ask, when submitting for the first time, does the text in NC require high-definition vector images? Thank you!
望土 2023-01-16
I have submitted several times, some were successful, some were not. Even the ones that were successful felt very difficult, with a long and demanding process.
毛毛家的 2023-01-16
Hello, the submission will send an email. It will display "Contacting Potential Reviewers".
molish 2023-01-16
2022.12.28 Transfer to NC, 2022.12.29 Editor Assigned, 2022.12.29 Manuscript under consideration, and the status has remained unchanged since then. May I ask if the status will change during the review process?
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now