数学追随者 2021-08-20

Rejected after submission, one reviewer with constructive comments. The rejection rate is quite high, and it seems that this journal primarily values innovation, recommending submissions with higher levels of innovation.

水非鱼 2021-02-06

This journal directly stated that my content format was incorrect and exceeded their journal's required page count by 6 pages. They used this as a reason to reject it directly, and the rejection feedback has no reference value.