时间燃烧 2022-03-22

Submitted on March 16, 2022.
With editor on March 17, 2022.

广西郭富城 2022-03-22

March 22, 2022, with editor.

fred001 2022-03-21

The article itself has been online for a long time, but it cannot be found on the web of science.

Lqb 2022-03-21

May I ask what state you are in now?

fred001 2022-03-17

Today I took another look, and there are only 46 left. So what happened...

fred001 2022-03-16

Last November, it was accepted and published online that month, but recently, when conducting literature retrieval, I found that it has not yet been included in the Web of Knowledge. A few days ago, when I checked, I found that there were already 261 articles published in 2022 that have been indexed. Today, when I checked again, it has decreased to 182 articles. I don't know what's going on. Currently, it seems that only the middle part of volume 306 has been indexed, and volume 307 has not been indexed at all. Does anyone know what's going on?

Xiao 2022-03-14

2020.03.08 提交给期刊
2020.03.09 与编辑讨论

广西郭富城 2022-03-12

March 12, 2022, with editor.

TaikongApple 2022-03-10

2022.3.10 with editor translates to "March 10, 2022 with editor" in English.

广西郭富城 2022-03-10

Submitted on March 10, 2022, wishing for good luck.

TaikongApple 2022-03-09

Submitted on March 9th, 2022, looking forward to it.

不踩坑的小垃圾 2022-03-08

The reviewer has been invited for over half a month. Previously, it only took half a month to be under review. This time is so slow, waiting is exhausting.

Samuel 2022-03-07

Hello, are you the one who made the changes and then submitted it again?

buctc 2022-03-02

Before, everything was fast, but this time it was surprisingly slow, and I had to remind them many times! They rejected it, it took a total of three months. It took over half a month from the end of the review to the rejection.

允允允允丶 2022-02-24

2022.1.20 with editor (editor-in-chief)
2022.2.1 with editor (subject editor)
2022.2.16 reviewer invited
2022.2.17 under review
2022.2.19 under review
2022.2.23 required reviews completed
Tragic rhythm...

ECM审稿人 2022-02-23

The text translates to: "Submitted for review at the beginning of November, and it is still under review until now. The status has changed seven or eight times during this period, which is mentally exhausting to wait."

buctc 2022-02-23

Why is it so slow now? Previously, it would take over a month for the first review. I sent an email on February 12th inquiring about it and received a reply from the editor. The Italian editor said that I should have results within ten days. Then the status changed directly to "review completed," and it's still the same now... It's been more than ten days. It's frustrating. I sent another email, and he said it would take a few more days. I wanted to curse, but then I couldn't send it. It's making me so angry.

浮白 2022-02-23

It has been 12 days since the reviewer was invited. Previously, the time was changed twice with the editor. When can it be delivered? Should I remind them?

Jesterr 2022-02-23

I have had several experiences submitting articles to Applied Energy (AE). Originally, I did not intend to give any evaluations, but recently, by chance, I discovered something that I want everyone to be aware of.

Previously, I submitted an article to AE, and after three months of review, it was rejected, with the comments of two reviewers returned to me. One reviewer had provided good feedback and numerous suggestions. However, the other reviewer directly used pretexts to reject the article, providing irrelevant and trashy comments. So, I wrote an appeal, but the reply I received was, "The decision of the editor-in-chief is final, and no appeals or rebuttals will be accepted."

Now for the more astonishing part: some time later, at a conference, I met a colleague of my senior, and after chatting, I found out that he was one of the reviewers for my article. He confidently told me that he had given me minor revisions, and after seeing the reviewer comments I received, he discovered that the AE editorial board had secretly added content after his review! He had given me suggestions for minor revisions, but the editor added a suggestion after his review to reject the article and have it resubmitted as a new article after major revisions! Many people have also noticed the chaotic management of AE's editorial department this year, but I won't go into detail about that. This is the first time I have encountered the manipulation of falsifying reviewer comments. From now on, I will submit to Energy Conversion and Management (ECM). If I am spreading rumors, then I will never be able to publish in SCI journals in my lifetime.

懒得起昵称 2022-02-19

I was the subject editor in charge, and after submitting, the status remained as "reviewer invited" for over a month. Although there is a new editor now, I still had to email the previous editor to receive a response, saying that they haven't found enough reviewers yet. Helplessly, it has been over a month, when will they finally find enough reviewers?!

Changyong Jin 2022-02-15

My wait for the reviewer was also close to three months. On the 13th, I received an email saying that it has been accepted.

Alanhaha 2022-02-15

Hey OP, how is your current status? Are you still "reviewer invited"? It's been a month for me already.

起风了~ 2022-02-13

2021.10.6 submitted to journal
2021.10.15 under review
2021.11.7 revise
2021.11.30 revision submitted to journal
2021.12.8 under review
2022.1.6 revise
2022.1.17 revision submitted to journal
2022.1.23 under review
2022.2.5 revise
2022.2.7 revision submitted to journal
2022.2.12 accept

Five reviewers, two minor revisions and three major revisions, more than thirty review comments. After the revisions, the first reviewer raised additional questions twice regarding certain issues. After three rounds of review, the paper was finally accepted. The quality of the paper has greatly improved, and we are grateful for the efforts of the editor and reviewers!

无边的少年 2022-02-13

2021-10-3, first submission
2021-10-23, second submission for modification
2022-1-17, minor revision
2022-2-3, rework
2022-2-12, accepted

学术青椒一枚 2022-02-08

Only view submission. I remember there used to be an option to write a letter in the previous system.

buctc 2022-02-08

By the way, in your system, is there an option to send emails to editors and withdraw manuscripts?

学术青椒一枚 2022-02-07

I want to ask the original poster how they know that the manuscript has been revised when the reviewer has not accepted the review?

学术青椒一枚 2022-02-07

11.28 submitted
11.29 with editor
12.4 assigned to responsible editor
12.7 under review
12.10 reviewer provided comments
12.15 revised date (total of three review comments)
12.28 received feedback for revision (given 21 days)
1.16 revised
1.18 under review
2.7 until now, no progress

Summary: The initial review process was really fast, but after the revision, the reviewer stopped responding to me. Sigh, feeling anxious and waiting to graduate.

学术青椒一枚 2022-02-07

I am also waiting for the graduation thesis. I will go back for a second revision for 20 days, and the date has not changed either.

种瓜得豆 2022-02-07

Yo yo yo, finally reached 20,000! I heard that the student relationships at this Shenzhen Graduate School LYZ have completely soured, and the college counselor has come out several times to mediate. Impressive, impressive! Looking forward to surpassing 30,000!