认证评论 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART C-JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
X.W. 2023-08-01
May I know approximately when can I proof and go online?
X.W. 2023-08-01
Post: 16-Apr-2023
Major Renovation: 06-Jun-2023
Received: 28-Jul-2023
回响 2023-07-04
Hello, does this journal have a Word template? I can't seem to find it.
行云流水 2023-07-02
Easy to hire, slow in review and handling of manuscripts, suitable for beginners or those wanting to fill up their submissions.
小张同学要加油 2023-05-26
5.08 major revision, four reviewers, evaluations are mixed, the editor requested a major revision, the first review took 7 months (possibly because my senior had submitted to this journal before me and got accepted, so they pushed my paper to the back).
一定加油啊 2023-05-23
Trash journal, rejection of minor revisions, speechless, waste of time.
明天花会开 2023-05-23
I have experienced the "charm" of a rubbish journal... It has been a month since submission, but it's still not online. It's incredibly slow... They don't even reply to emails. They should at least publish my work quickly!!! Is part C a rubbish journal???
小白 2023-05-17
My card has been awaiting review scores for over a month.
小白 2023-05-17
Bless the host, may I ask what is the current situation now?
小白 2023-05-17
It will enter the next stage, which is Under review, in about a week.
小白 2023-05-17
2.17 Submission
3.4 Under review
4.4 Awaiting reviewer scores
It has been over a month since submission and there has been no change in the status of the paper. Typically, the review process takes about a month. Should I email the editor to inquire about the status?
scixiaobai 2023-05-16
May I ask when the manuscript will be reviewed after submission? Currently, it has been stuck at the "Awaiting Editor Assignment" stage.
天涯的心跳 2023-05-15
Ask all the Newton experts here, how can I correctly send an email to the editor? I sent two withdrawal letters but they seemed to be ignored... Besides contacting the journal through the submission system, are there any other effective ways?
鸡鸡叫,哇哇哇 2023-05-10
22-11-12 Submission;
23-1-15 Major revision;
23-4-05 Major revision submission;
23-05-01 Accepted.
阿俊冲 2023-05-06
How many reviewers does this journal generally have?
明天花会开 2023-04-24
It's very slow!!!! Extremely slow... Trash journal is just a trash journal. Can't stand it... I submitted it in October last year, and even after minor revisions, it still needs to be reviewed by the reviewer... Can it be any slower?
小张同学要加油 2023-04-16
Mechanical control direction
阿俊冲 2023-04-14
Ah ha, why can't it exceed 5000 characters, it's too little, isn't it?
阿金水论文 2023-04-13
What is the direction of your thesis? Why is the review process so slow?
小张同学要加油 2023-04-12
Ah? Can it be done like this? It's my first time hearing about it! I've also made the decision for two months, but it hasn't come down yet. I'm afraid it's also like this.
小红0509 2023-04-10
The decision has been made for over two months, couldn't resist urging for the manuscript, and as a result, it has been sent for review again...
阿俊冲 2023-04-04
Why is the journal so slow? Is it because the quality of the journal is not good, or is it because the reviewers they found are unwilling to review?
辽工大一号 2023-03-30
What should I do if the repetition rate is high, OP?
yxcsatjzsj 2023-03-25
I received a reply from you for the first time when I sent an email.
After that, I didn't pay attention to it because the quality of the journal is not high. Let it be~~
yxcsatjzsj 2023-03-25
I received the same reply as you when I sent an email for the first time. After that, I didn't pay attention because the quality of the journal is not high. Let it be as it is~
阿俊冲 2023-03-25
Oh my God, half a year is too long, can I remind them twice to review the draft? Last time they replied saying they are actively searching for reviewers.
阿俊冲 2023-03-25
My follow-up response for the urging of my manuscript is to say that I am still looking for potential reviewers.
yxcsatjzsj 2023-03-22
It is really too slow.
Submitted on December 5, 21.
Sent an email to urge in the middle, but it didn't seem to be of any use.
Returned with Minor Revision on June 15, 22, and submitted the revised version on June 30, 22.
Returned with Minor Revision again on December 20, 22, and submitted the revised version on January 2, 23.
Accepted on January 7, 23.
Published on March 15, 23.
The Minor Revisions were all trivial issues, quite trivial.
However, the quality of articles in this journal is indeed poor. Even conference papers can be submitted with just a few modifications. So, when I didn't hear anything for over a month after the first submission, I just ignored it.
During the submission period, I also had two other articles accepted. When I received the second round of minor revision suggestions, I almost didn't recognize this article.
Leon_W 2023-03-20
I might not have found the first reviewer, and after four months, I sent a reminder again. The reply stated that the invitation to review by the expert was rejected.
想你的一天 2023-03-19
Submitted in April 27th last year and accepted on March 15th this year, it took nearly a year. After undergoing a major revision, finally being accepted was not easy at all. Fortunately, the outcome was good. Thank you.
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now