慧慧 2022-09-07

Economic empirical research is currently in a minor revision status and has been modified and completed, ready to be returned. Koukou 3628787129.

Wangyk123 2022-08-30

Supplement, decision in process on 2022/08/30.
Pre-reception on 2022/08/30.

I have reminded once in July and once again on August 19th, I am in urgent need and can't wait any longer... That's why I reminded twice.

T_A_Y 2022-08-22

May I ask if it is necessary to submit the source code? Is it a mandatory requirement? Can I choose not to open-source the code?

T_A_Y 2022-08-22

Do you need the source code to be open-source?

mnx 2022-08-22

Is this submission page expensive?

羊毛哥1 2022-08-20

Don't worry about this email. I will send you the word version of the proofreading later, and you can make modifications based on this version.

奇犽小可爱 2022-08-18

Urgent, I would like to consult friends who have experience with this journal. After the pre-acceptance, the journal sent me an assignment letter, but it didn't specify in detail which areas I need to revise. So, what exactly do I need to change? Should I check the PLOS ONE latex format myself and make the changes?

奇犽小可爱 2022-08-18

I want to ask about the requirement of revising the manuscript during the pre-acceptance phase of the journal. However, there is no mention in the email about what needs to be changed. What kind of situation is this?

ahhaaa 2022-08-16

I am also in the same situation. I have been under review for 4 months, and when I emailed to inquire about the status, they said that the academic editor couldn't find a reviewer.

文文文文 2022-08-13

After being rejected last time, I submitted another article from the past, and unexpectedly, it was accepted. This journal is really impressive, with fast speed. Thumbs up!

ahhaaa 2022-08-03

I have been under review for four months.

东华王 2022-07-29

It is not necessary to submit the source code of the paper.

阿尔诺的蓝1 2022-07-27

Does PlosOne require the submission of source code? Thank you.

简兮 2022-07-23

Timeline of Manuscript Submission:
February 18th - Submitted
March 3rd - Under review
May 5th - Minor revisions (22 comments from two reviewers)
June 13th - Revised manuscript returned to the journal
July 19th - Pre-acceptance (The status was "with editor" from June 13th until pre-acceptance)
July 23rd - Official acceptance

阿尔诺的蓝1 2022-07-22

Do I have to submit the source code to PlosOne? Thank you.

阿尔诺的蓝1 2022-07-22

Does PlosOne have to provide the source code?

阿尔诺的蓝1 2022-07-22

Do I have to submit the source code for PlosOne?

阿尔诺的蓝1 2022-07-22

Do I have to submit the source code to Plosone?

山里桃花红 2022-07-14

Share one of the comments from a reviewer:
Reviewer #2: The importance of the topic discussed in the Introduction Section needs to be revised as it will engage readers and encourage them to read further. Additionally, the paper is missing a paragraph about the research motivation and challenges in the introduction section. The structure of the paper is unclear.

山里桃花红 2022-07-14

The text criticizes certain aspects of a paper, highlighting its shortcomings. It states that the motivation part is absent, meaning the reasons behind conducting the research are not clearly stated. It also mentions that the contributions made in the paper are not adequately explained from a scientific perspective. The introduction is deemed too broad and familiar, as it discusses concepts already well-known in the field of fake news detection. Consequently, the introduction fails to engage the reader and does not present any innovative topics or solutions that would encourage further reading of the paper.

山里桃花红 2022-07-14

The Related work section is poorly written. It is essential to conduct an analysis of recently published state-of-the-art works in a tabular form.

In the Model Section, the overall workflow of the technical roadmap is missing. The authors have not adequately described the novelty of their work in the manuscript. Please provide a sequence diagram to illustrate the interaction among the various phases.

山里桃花红 2022-07-14

In the Result Section, authors are advised to provide a clear and detailed description of the analysis part of their work that they have claimed. The evaluation presented lacks the necessary level of rigor needed for a scientific comparison of stochastic algorithms. More specifically, statistical tests should be employed to determine whether the differences observed in the figures are statistically significant or merely the result of chance.

山里桃花红 2022-07-14

The "Conclusion and Directions for Future Research" section has not been appropriately organized.
The bibliography references are incomplete and do not follow a consistent format.
In general, the structure of the manuscript is very weak and is not recommended for publication in this prestigious scientific journal.

山里桃花红 2022-07-14

The first con is that the product is quite expensive.
2. The second con is that it is not very durable.
3. The third con is that it has limited functionality.

山里桃花红 2022-07-14

Although it was rejected, I'd like to share the process:
Submitted on 4.27
Three weeks with the editor, sent emails, one week under review
Decision on 6.26
Rejected on 6.30

biubiubiu123456 2022-07-12

Hello, may I ask if the email for paying is sent only to the corresponding author or to the first author as well?

biubiubiu123456 2022-07-12

How to pay the money, does anyone know the steps?

kinhaoo108 2022-07-06

The journal editorial department has a good attitude, and the academic editors are diligent and responsible. The three assigned external reviewers are very serious and provide good suggestions.
April 18: Submitted, waiting for editor's response for 5 days.
April 23: Under review.
May 6: Received reviewer's comments. The review process was fast, and based on everyone's experience, the review period in my field generally does not exceed three weeks.
Three external reviewers were assigned, two minor revisions and one major revision. It took about one and a half months to make the revisions.
June 17: Revised manuscript returned to the editorial department.
June 27: Pre-acceptance, addressing formatting issues.
July 1: Officially accepted.
Currently waiting for the invoice process.

文文文文 2022-06-29

Today, you were notified to pay $1805, which is equivalent to 12,200 yuan in Chinese currency.

我是洗衣机 2022-06-28

Our article actually originated from my side project. At first, I only wrote a few small scripts for significance testing. As the functionality increased, I organized it into a Shiny App. Later on, I decided to write an article and give it a try. However, because it was not driven by a scientific question, there were very few journals to choose from.

Then, on January 11, 2021, I submitted it to Plos One. It took one or two months to find an editor and reviewers, and finally on June 9, 2021, we received the feedback. One reviewer thought the idea was good but the statistical methods had issues and needed to be redesigned. The article was rejected but welcomed for resubmission.

Later, due to various reasons, the paper remained idle for two months. During a period of rest and recovery from an injury, I rewrote the program and the paper. On August 22, 2021, it was resubmitted. Once again, it took several months to find an editor and reviewers, and around April 2022, we received the reviewer's comments. Both reviewers suggested adding tips and explanations of the methods on the interface. They also discovered some small loopholes in the program that needed to be fixed. This required major revisions.

During this period, I made time to rewrite the program and the paper due to other matters. In May 2022, we resubmitted. The status with the editor lasted for about a month, and then on June 28, 2022, it was accepted. The proofreading process took place within a week. Interestingly, this day happened to be my birthday.