认证评论 - ORGANOMETALLICS
木头人1993 2022-05-16
02/07 submitted
02/08 re-submitted (wrong figure numbering, editor asked for adjustment)
03/03 major revision (3 reviewers)
04/03 re-submitted
04/29 minor revision
05/10 accepted.
The editor and reviewers highly appreciated this work. In fact, the article encountered a phenomenon completely unrelated to our research field, which required great effort to explain. The reviewers were knowledgeable in this aspect and provided many constructive suggestions, which were very helpful. In the end, I am very happy that the article was accepted.
木头人1993 2022-04-06
The gold content of OM is really good, after all, it has a long history and cannot be compared to many other high-scoring journals.
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started