认证评论 - OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

chrisjia 2022-04-25

I submitted my work in early March and have been with the editor for almost two months. The deadline has also been changed once during this period. I don't know what's going on!!??

lsjlxc 2022-04-08

Hello classmate, may I add you as a friend? I submitted it to the editor four days ago, and it has been under review for almost two months. Can I ask for your advice?

sys8866 2022-04-08

I want to ask everyone, what does it mean when the date changes during the second review?

LaserL 2022-04-06

Do not submit if you are in a rush to graduate. It takes one to two months just for the editorial department to review. Some editors of this publication are extremely irresponsible. Even after one month of submission, it is still "with editor". Despite multiple email reminders, there is no response from the editor, only formal replies from Elsevier staff. Helplessly, I had to withdraw my submission.

FrozneAr 2022-04-01

December 24, 2021 Submitted
December 25, 2021 With Editor
January 13, 2022 Under Review
January 16, 2022 Required Reviews Completed
February 16, 2022 Major revision
March 3, 2022 Revision Submitted to Journal
March 4, 2022 With Editor
March 16, 2022 Required Reviews Completed
April 1, 2022 Accept

peter 2022-03-31

Hello, this is my first time submitting to this journal. My field is also optics. I would like to ask, what documents do I need if I want to submit a revised version? Is it only necessary to provide a response to the reviewer's comments and the modified article with the changes marked?

闪电灰太狼 2022-03-26

I specialize in laser processing, and fellow students from the same group often submit articles to this journal. I had prepared for a long time, but surprisingly, this time it went very quickly.

Submitted at the beginning of the year,
One month later - under review (this speed is frustrating)
Two weeks later - received feedback for major revisions, but the comments were not too harsh (unexpectedly)
One week to complete the revisions and submit again, and the next day it went for review
After 24 days, it was directly accepted for publication

So, overall, this experience was quite good. I hope it can be helpful for everyone.

尹弼君 2022-03-16

This journal, let me tell you one thing, it's so slow that you might not even get it by the time you graduate.
Submitted in June 2021, the first review took three months.
Revised in August 2021, the second review has been under review for 7 months so far, still not completed.
The reviewer or editor might have died from COVID-19, what a trashy journal.
I f*cking hate it.

horizon_ghost 2022-03-10

It took more than three months from submission to acceptance, with a total of four reviewers providing very constructive feedback. They offered profound suggestions on the processing principles and core content of the article, which greatly helped in improving the article. I will consider submitting again in the future.

keiai 2022-03-08

New Year's Day submission, I haven't received the review comments yet. May I ask about your status?

山芋派 2022-02-23

The second article accepted by OLT was reviewed much faster this time.
October 2, 2021: Submission (reviewed by the editor in about three weeks)
November 30, 2021: Major revision
January 9, 2022: Revised submission
February 22, 2022: Minor revision
February 23, 2022: Accepted
The editorial process was indeed slow, probably because of the large number of manuscripts. However, it ultimately depends on the reviewers. In this case, out of the four reviewers, two rejected the article and two accepted it. After responding to the rejection comments and refuting them, the initially rejecting reviewers agreed to accept the article. Later, a minor revision was requested due to a grammatical issue in a sentence. Therefore, when facing rejection comments, it is necessary to respond and refute them.

哇咔咔2 2022-01-29

Recently, I reviewed two articles for this magazine, and I feel that the level of the reviewers is really not up to par with a second-tier magazine. It is obvious that there are too many Chinese reviewers. Articles with obvious flaws and poor-quality images were unexpectedly accepted. As a reviewer, one should have some professional ethics. Even if their English is not good, they should at least ensure the quality of the images and check whether the author has published similar papers before.

I really want to criticize, some Chinese reviewers are really scum. Besides extortion for citations, they don't even have basic academic ethics.

芭比Q了 2022-01-26

2022.01.25 under review

moonboy 2022-01-12

It can be calculated that today is January 12, 2022, and the IF has already reached 4.33.

powerhit 2022-01-10

A very frustrating journal, the editor-in-chief of the journal changed during the second revision. After waiting for more than two months, the new editor-in-chief rejected it. We wrote a letter to the new editor-in-chief, who asked us to resubmit, so we did. Then we waited for another month and were directly rejected, saying that articles that were already rejected for resubmission would not be reviewed. It's really frustrating, going back and forth for 7 months.

zhouzhou997 2022-01-09

After New Year's Day, I submitted it. Now, it's with the editor... I don't know how long I have to wait. I hope it can be reviewed as soon as possible.

我爱如月 2021-12-26

Worship the God, the basic version really upgraded to the second district, so awesome!

麦迪阿拉卡 2021-12-23

It took a total of 6 months, and finally received...

光学倒霉蛋 2021-12-13

My senior received the job offer one month before and after, while mine took longer because I had to revise it three times in the middle (which took a total of four months to be hired). The time with the editor depends on the direction and the difficulty of finding reviewers. It took me two weeks to submit for review, and the speed of the review process depends on luck (since the editor doesn't have the authority to control the efficiency of the reviewers). My senior received feedback in three weeks, while I received it in one month. The subsequent decision-making stage by the editor was completed within a few days. After reading many comments, I feel somewhat lucky as the editor and the review process were relatively fast.

cx1996 2021-12-11

The following text translates to English as: "On August 18th, submitted with editor and it lasted for three months. Now it is in the state of Required Reviews Completed, and this status has lasted for half a month. The speed is so slow..."

光学倒霉蛋 2021-12-11

It is estimated that it took a long time to find a reviewer.

kijijj 2021-12-05

I submitted it on September 2nd, and it has been with the editor all this time. It was only under review yesterday, December 4th. This speed is really impressive, I must admit.

爱乔 2021-11-29

Really speechless... Last submission
Submitted to Journal    April 10, 2021
Under review          April 19, 2021
Decision in Process     Sep 23, 2021
Minor Revision        Oct 03, 2021
Revision Submitted to Journal   Oct 05, 2021
With Editor            Oct 06, 2021
Under review          Oct 09, 2021
Accept                Nov 25, 2021

yinghan 2021-11-23

What I checked at that time was the option to urge, and generally chose the third option. The first two options didn't seem to fit the purpose of wanting to inquire or urge a little.

yinghan 2021-11-23

Based on your situation, I selected the third option to urge the manuscript. Please double-check it yourself.

autumn 2021-11-23

Which type should I choose? I see two options for extending the time, and one is a special recommendation. Which one should I choose?

frank小北 2021-11-23

May I ask how to proactively withdraw a submission?

yinghan 2021-11-21

After logging in, you can see a page displaying the status of the submission. On the leftmost column of Actions, there is an option for "send-email." Select your type, and then send the email following the specified format. For reference, my paper was under initial review by the editor for 7 weeks.

autumn 2021-11-21

I have submitted for a month, and it is still in the initial review (with editor) status. I would like to ask where to submit the reminder letter?

星光熠熠 2021-11-18

How is the original poster doing now?

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started