认证评论 - MEASUREMENT
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

好久不见 2021-09-05

5.22 submission
8.11 major revision
8.24 return
9.4 acceptance
Moderate speed, reviewers are quite professional, and it is a very good journal in the field of measurement.

LXL93 2021-09-03

2021.1.11 Submission
2021.6.11 Major Revision
2021.8.16 Minor Revision
2021.8.30 Accepted

gzf 2021-09-02

Excuse me, when it comes to returns, how should the format be adjusted? Thank you.

静待花开22 2021-08-24

02.08.2021 - Submitted to journal
02.12 - With editor
3.22 - Refused

04.09 - Submitted
04.13 - With editor
04.14 - Under review
05.10 - Revision required (Major Revision)

05.17 - Revision submitted to journal
05.18 - With editor
May 25, 2021 - Under review

07.07 - Accepted with minor revision
07.08 - Revision submitted to journal
Jul 09, 2021 - With editor
Jul 16, 2021 - Accepted

彩色天空 2021-08-21

The following text is already in English.

冰冰novak 2021-08-21

There are a total of five reviewers. Reviewers 1 and 2 have positive opinions and did not raise any questions. The other three reviewers each raised 3-5 minor questions, which can be easily addressed. The detailed process of the manuscript's status is as follows:

4.19 Submitted
4.21 Under Review
5.2 Under Review
5.13 Under Review
6.2 Required Reviews Completed
6.15 Required Reviews Completed
6.21 Required Reviews Completed
6.22 Decision in Process
6.22 Major Revision
7.11 Revision Submitted to Journal
7.13 Revisions Sent Back to Author (Highlights word count does not match)
7.15 with editor
7.26 Under Review
8.11 Required Reviews Completed
8.20 Accept
Overall, the speed of the review process is satisfactory.

candyone 2021-08-19

2.8.2021 under review translates to "2nd August 2021 under review" in English.

tangtang. 2021-08-17

Jun 10, 2021 submission
Aug 17, 2021 accept

wong 2021-08-16

May I ask who you think the editor is?

chensiya 2021-08-06

Received the proof email on August 5th.

ccjj 2021-08-04

How long will it take to receive the online proof link after accepting?

七彩 2021-08-02

Submitted on December 1, 2020, and after three major revisions, it was finally accepted on August 1, 2021. I encountered three major revisions, and each time the reviewer was changed, which was a bit frustrating.

awei 2021-07-31

Posted on July 30th, due to some missing names of co-authors, two individuals cannot currently be reached, so they cannot confirm their status as co-authors. Will this affect the progress of my review? The current status of the manuscript is "Submitted to Journal" and has not yet been assigned an article number. Have any of you encountered this situation?

liujianguo 2021-07-30

Posted on July 4th. Rejected on July 30th. The third submission, on fiber optic gyroscope noise reduction. The review process was fast, and they provided many useful suggestions. They emphasized the need to improve English and had high expectations for the experiments. I learned a lot. I wonder what the acceptance rate is for this journal's open access submissions. Can anyone who knows please share?

井晚打老虎2500245760 2021-07-29

What did the email from the editor say?

2021-07-29

Reviewed for six months, there were a total of eight questions from two reviewers, all of which were minor issues related to formatting and grammar. The editor rejected it outright, and I am truly speechless.

chensiya 2021-07-23

The research direction is anomaly detection of spacecraft telemetry data. I have submitted to journals such as Acta Astronautica and Aerospace Science and Technology, but they were rejected almost instantly. Finally, I submitted to this journal.

June 4, 2021: Submitted
June 5, 2021: Under review
June 25, 2021: Required reviews complete
June 28, 2021: Major revision (opinions from 5 reviewers)
July 8, 2021: Submitted major revision
July 10, 2021: Under review
July 21, 2021: Accepted with minor revision
July 22, 2021: Minor revisions required
July 23, 2021: Accepted
Overall, it went smoothly. I hope the journal continues to improve.

347 2021-07-11

Bro, may I ask how long did you wait for your first-instance opinion?

JM_Wang 2021-07-10

After three rounds of review, one major revision, and two minor revisions, it was quickly accepted with high efficiency. The only dissatisfaction is that the publishing editor may be a novice, as the "where" in the formula is indented by two spaces, and some equations are also not properly aligned.

347 2021-07-08

Second submission, it has been under review for a full two months now. The Status Date has changed 7 or 8 times already. Is everyone experiencing the same slowness? The key is that when I submitted the first time, I received a response within a month, even though it was a rejection. I feel so anxious. I hope I don't graduate before receiving any news...

做高尚的人 2021-07-03

Jul 03, 2021 Accept
Transcendence never deceives me, the doctor's debut settles the dust.

wall-e 2021-07-03

Submission on April 16th, under review on April 24th, under review on June 10th. It is still under external review until now and feels a bit slow.

做高尚的人 2021-07-03

Jul 03, 2021 Decision in Process
It's time to face the judgment of fate, love me once again and go beyond!

小石头不会沉 2021-07-03

2021.6.30 with editor
2021.7.3 accepted

The overall speed from submission to acceptance was relatively fast. Thank you to the editor and the reviewers. I wish the journal continued success! Also, I hope everyone achieves positive outcomes.

小石头不会沉 2021-07-03

2021.6.30 with editor
2021.7.3 accepted
The overall speed from submission to acceptance was relatively fast. Thank you to the editor and the reviewers. I wish the journal continued success! Also, I hope everyone achieves good results.

v587eureka 2021-07-01

First submission, went smoothly.

小石头不会沉 2021-06-30

Continue to wait, hoping for a smooth acceptance.

秋风暖暖 2021-06-30

This time, I changed the topic; changed the highlights; rewrote the domestic and international situation. I made some slight modifications to the introduction. This time, I only chose the field of artificial intelligence, it seems that I chose something else last time. I hope to choose a different editor for review ~ Although the suggested journal is also good, after all, this journal has a large publication volume, which is quite attractive.

做高尚的人 2021-06-30

To be honest, the most probable outcome will not change, and the editor will not embarrass themselves.

秋风暖暖 2021-06-29

In the field of deep learning fault diagnosis, there are many articles about deep learning fault diagnosis on measurements. How can I be recommended to submit to them? What effect will it have if I refuse to resubmit? Does anyone know the inside story?

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now