认证评论 - MEASUREMENT
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

YUANYUAN1231 2022-05-30

@wmt123 This is quite difficult to say. I have changed it 6 times. If there are three reviewers, I might agree to change it once during the review process and then change it again based on their feedback.

zzy_zzy123 2022-05-29

Hello, have you received the results on your end? I'm also at this stage, it has been a week already. After the review is completed, how long does it usually take in the editing process?

wmt123 2022-05-29

I would like to ask about the changing status of "under review" multiple times. I noticed that you have also experienced this situation. Do you know the specific reasons for it?

YUANYUAN1231 2022-05-27

2022.05.26 reviews required have been completed.

a斗 2022-05-27

5.26 One time under review.

a斗 2022-05-26

5.11 submit; (Submitted on May 11th)
5.16 with editor; (Under review by the editor on May 16th)
5.20 under review; (Under review on May 20th)
5.25 under review. (Still under review on May 25th)

The text does not specify whether it is a rejection or a refusal.

YUANYUAN1231 2022-05-26

Hello, can you please provide us with a history of submissions for reference?

lin 2022-05-26

Submitted twice, both times requiring major revisions. The time from submission to receiving the final results was approximately 3 and a half months and over 4 months, respectively. There were 3-4 reviewers involved in the process. The review time was average, with a large volume of submissions. However, recently there has been a tendency for the process to slow down.

JCKA 2022-05-25

One week, the speed is okay, but not as fast as before.

JCKA 2022-05-25

One week, the speed is still considered fast, but not as fast as before.

YUANYUAN1231 2022-05-25

Last year was still in District 3, but this year it has been upgraded to District 2, so there are more people submitting contributions. As a result, the process is now very slow.

a斗 2022-05-25

Hasn't this journal always been in the second tier of the Chinese Academy of Sciences?

Xcasual 2022-05-25

I have also been assigned to edit this. Is there any way to crack it?

Xcasual 2022-05-25

I don't know if the journal can be upgraded to the second tier of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2022.

cong-cong wang 2022-05-25

It has always been the status of submitting contributions to the editorial department.

井晚打老虎2500245760 2022-05-24

It has been six months already, really dragging on.

九十八号 2022-05-23

Return the comments in over a month, make substantial revisions, and expect to receive them in about a week after the revisions. There are three reviewers, with two having positive opinions, and one being neutral.

Annia 2022-05-23

Hello, OP, may I ask who is the editor you have been assigned to? I haven't heard anything yet and seeing everyone's comments, I feel worried that my work is also being delayed for a long time.

Annia 2022-05-23

Hello, OP. May I ask who the editor you were assigned to is? I am also anxiously waiting.

lovage 2022-05-22

I would like to ask how many days it takes for the revision of your article to be submitted to the journal? It has been 6 days since I resubmitted it to the editor, but it still remains in the "under review" status. Does it mean that the journal has not started processing it at all?

YUANYUAN1231 2022-05-20

2022.5.20 Under review

我是一个小学生i 2022-05-20

Update:
5.16 with editor (date change)
5.18 under review

Evaluation: It seems that the speed of finding reviewers determines the progress. Hoping for good news.

a斗 2022-05-19

It is indeed very strange. Submitted on 5.11, reviewed by the editor on 5.16, and there has been no change so far. However, it is indeed slower than before.

bakehuoen 2022-05-19

2022.4.24 Submission
2022.4.26 Under review
Currently, it is May 19th. Waiting.

lazn 2022-05-19

2022.04.12 - Submitted initial draft
2022.04.14 - Under review
2022.05.19 - Major revision, 3 reviewers, all gave positive feedback.
Reviewer 1 - Pointed out excessive exaggeration in the introduction.
Reviewer 2 - Suggested polishing some parts of the text.
Reviewer 3 - Recommended accepting the paper as is.
The journal has extremely high efficiency.

叔均 2022-05-19

I submitted it on May 15th, and it is still submitted to the journal today. Has this journal become slower?

Annia 2022-05-19

Looking at everyone's comments, why am I not daring to vote? Is it because it's so slow?

Nemo46 2022-05-19

For oneself, it feels much slower than NDT&E.

shengaoyimiba 2022-05-19

Did you send it now? I have been with the editor for almost a month.

shengaoyimiba 2022-05-19

Another week has passed, still no news.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Ask a Question. Answer a Question.

Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.

Get Started