认证评论 - Journal of the European Ceramic Society
Yag 2022-06-08
It has been a month and a half with the editor, and it has not been sent for review yet. It's too slow.
方方哥 2022-06-06
I feel the same way. Now, the review process at Otao is so slow that it's making me want to vomit. I urgently need to use it.
锋舐 2022-06-06
Submitted in mid-April, during which I served as the editor-in-chief and the deputy editor for two weeks. Then it was sent for review, and the feedback came back after about a month, requiring major revisions. After returning for a week, it was accepted.
杨权 2022-06-02
Although this journal is good, the editor is very poor. The first review took over four months, and the final revision comments were only received after urging for them. It was messed up two or three times in a row, and then it was rejected by the editor. The handling of the matter was very poor.
wuuuyyy 2022-05-25
May I ask how long it takes for the status of "required reviews completed" to change?
something 2022-05-21
2022.5.5 submit to journal
2022.5.6 with editor (editor in chief)
2022.5.9 with editor (senior editor)
The status has not changed until now, what's going on? Are there so many people submitting to Euro Ceramic? It has been so long and it still hasn't been reviewed?
科研小白一个 2022-05-16
Recently, it feels quite slow. I have also been with the Editor for a week.
来几米 2022-05-16
Me too, it's been three weeks already. It's now on the third editor's hands, but there has been no progress. Is it just me or is Outao being slow lately?
Yag 2022-05-14
The chief editor has transferred it to the editor for almost a month now, but it is still not under review. I don't know what the situation is.
15927064010 2022-05-13
I also encountered this situation and changed editors three times. How long does the initial review take? Did you finally submit it for review?
chengeke 2022-04-10
It has been about ten days in this state. Have there been any updates on the status of the two upstairs? Recently, it feels like the speed of processing manuscripts by Europe and Tao has slowed down a lot. Previously, it took a month to wait for review.
mm-8888 2022-04-06
I have completed the required reviews on March 22nd, but there is still no result. I feel speechless. It has been almost 3 months since I submitted the article.
king-8888 2022-04-05
As of March 28th, the required reviews were completed, but until today, April 5th, the situation remains the same. Why is Eurail so slow recently? I don't know what's going on. Can anyone please enlighten me?
undefined 2022-03-17
Received safely without any danger.
xiaoaxiaojiji 2022-03-17
The problems are quite simple, but they happened to coincide with the Chinese New Year. I didn't have the motivation to make improvements during the holiday, so I missed the deadline. Wishing everyone good luck.
xiaoaxiaojiji 2022-03-17
2021.12.16 Submission
2021.12.24 Review
2022.01.06 Mandatory Revision
2022.03.03 Submission
2022.03.14 Acceptance
The editor is Jozef Vleugels. Fortunately, we encountered reviewers in the relevant field. Seven questions were addressed and some experiments were added.
king-8888 2022-03-16
You haven't assigned an editor yet! The pre-audit process at Outo is so slow!!!
king-8888 2022-03-16
Posted on March 3rd, handled by the chief editor on March 4th, replaced with a senior editor on March 7th, and arrived at the editor on March 11th. However, it has not been sent for review yet. Isn't it supposed to be sent for review within two days with the editor? If you want to send it, please do so; if you want to reject it, just do it straightforwardly! Why is Outho so slow? The initial process is already equivalent to three reviewers!!! Can't handle it!!!
calmesummer 2022-02-24
Not being sent for review and being rejected, it might be due to insufficient innovation for the paper to be accepted for publication.
jackzhang1 2022-02-03
One week for review, one month for feedback.
The reviewers have reviewed my previous articles and said that some explanations are quite similar and lack innovation.
JinHong G 2022-01-24
January 18th, the deputy editor is handling it.
I have submitted it a few times, and the chief editor rejected it twice. The deputy editor also rejected it. The chief editor rejected it directly once. Hopefully, it will be approved this time. May the god of silicates bless it.
多孔陶瓷 2022-01-24
2021.12.06 submitted to journal
2021.12.06 with editor
2021.12.13 under review
2021.1.09 required reviews completed
2022.1.11 minor revision
2022.1.21 submitted to journal, with editor
2022.1.24 accept
Translated into English:
2021.12.06 submitted to journal
2021.12.06 with editor
2021.12.13 under review
2021.1.09 required reviews completed
2022.1.11 minor revision
2022.1.21 submitted to journal, with editor
2022.1.24 accept
zephyrcui 2022-01-19
On January 7th, a reminder was sent, and a reply letter was received. Completed-Accepted on January 18th, 2022.
JinHong G 2022-01-12
January 10th - Submitted
January 11th - Under editor's handling
zephyrcui 2021-12-31
Emanuel Ionescu, Ph.D.
科研小菜菜111 2021-12-29
May I ask which editor is handling your email?
zephyrcui 2021-12-21
2021.08.29 Submitted to Journal
2021.08.30 With Editor
2021.09.04 Under review
2021.10.03 Required Reviews Completed
2021.10.03 Compulsory Major Revision
2021.11.03 Submitted to Journal, With Editor
2021.11.05 With Editor
2021.11.12 Under Review
It has been 9 days and 1 month since the second review, I don't know what's going on.
TV唯物主义 2021-12-20
10.17 Submitted to journal
10.18 With editor
10.24 With editor
10.26 Under review
11.19 Required reviews completed
11.24 Major revision
12.12 Revised
12.13 With editor
12.19 Accept
TV唯物主义 2021-11-22
May I ask, how many reviewers are usually involved?
TV唯物主义 2021-11-22
Boss, may I ask how many reviewers are there usually?
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started