yjjol 2021-06-15

Hello, how long have you been with the editor?

SGLJ 2021-06-09

After revising, I have been working with the editor as well.

yjjol 2021-06-08

Currently under revision, with the editor for 8 days, there has been no change in status.

SGLJ 2021-06-07

Has the recruitment been done now?

SGLJ 2021-06-07

Has it been hired now?

yjjol 2021-05-25

After the revision, it was under review for two months.
The current status is: required reviews completed for one week.
Has anyone encountered a similar situation?

SGLJ 2021-04-30

After the second review of the draft, it is under review again.

科研临时工 2021-04-30

Okay, personally I think this journal is very formal. In this case, they should have sent your revised version to the reviewers for another review. Don't worry, just wait.

SGLJ 2021-04-29

The comments from the first review are relatively friendly, and after carefully responding to the review comments within a week, the required reviews were completed. Then, in less than a day, it is immediately "Under review" again. Does this mean that the editor invited new reviewers? Can the new reviewers see the comments from the previous reviewers and my responses? Does "arbitration" refer to re-reviewing, or does it mean that the new reviewers have to make a decision to accept or reject?

SGLJ 2021-04-28

What is the situation behind? Is it a major disagreement?

SGLJ 2021-04-24

Did you finally get hired?

石头博士 2021-04-13

There should be a detailed introduction in the email.

echo.wy 2021-04-02

Hello, I would like to ask a question. The journal mentioned that I need to submit an attachment called "Response to Technical Inspection Results." This is the first time I have encountered this and I am completely clueless. Can you provide any assistance? Thank you!

echo.wy 2021-04-02

Hello, I would like to ask a question. The journal has mentioned that they require a "response to technical inspection results" attachment. This is the first time I have encountered this and I am completely clueless. Can you provide assistance? Thank you.

科研临时工 2021-03-29

The most difficult process is revising the draft and Decision in process.

科研临时工 2021-03-29

Submit 2020.12.28
With editor 2020.12.29
Under Review 2021.01.13
Major Revision 2021.02.06
Minor Revision 2021.03.13
Decision in process 2021.03.17
Accept 2021.03.25

Translation:
Submit 2020.12.28
With editor 2020.12.29
Under Review 2021.01.13
Major Revision 2021.02.06
Minor Revision 2021.03.13
Decision in process 2021.03.17
Accept 2021.03.25

科研临时工 2021-03-18

Okay, thank you very much!

sup 2021-03-17

This is the most disgusting journal I have ever submitted to. The first time I submitted, they said the format was incorrect, so I made changes. I can understand that, it's part of the technical review process. After making the changes, I resubmitted it. However, the editor-in-chief said the Introduction needed to be modified and resubmitted. I spent a long time rewriting the Introduction, and after more than ten days, they said it's not within their journal's scope. I want to ask, if it's not within the scope, why did you ask me to make changes? Isn't our time as authors valuable?

sup 2021-03-17

I'm really fed up with this journal. The editor asked me to resubmit the Introduction, and I spent a lot of time revising it. Then they said it's not within the scope. If it's not within the scope, they should have just rejected it directly. Why did they let me revise it and waste so much time?

Elec_tang 2021-03-15

Have encountered, self-cited papers refer to citing one's own published papers. Some journal publishers are concerned about authors excessively citing their own papers, therefore they require the proportion of self-cited papers to the total number of references to be provided.

科研临时工 2021-03-14

Hello, I would like to ask, what does it mean when the editor says to include the percentage of self-cited papers in the reference list in the cover letter? Have you encountered this before?

Elec_tang 2021-03-14

Finally, I want to say that luckily, "perseverance brings a clear moon", for the first paper in my life, I thank everyone who helped me and thank JMPT Magazine. May the magazine continue to thrive, and may I find love this year. I hope that in the future, I will not forget my original intentions and continue to forge ahead!

Elec_tang 2021-03-14

My paper was handled by Dr. Cao, the chief editor. Overall, I felt that the efficiency of JMPT Journal is quite high, and they did not delay the submission process. During the first review, my paper stayed with the reviewers for a long time (from October 20th to March 21st), with four reviewers. Two reviewers suggested minor revisions before accepting, one suggested major revisions before accepting, and one did not provide clear opinions, only commenting that the headings in the manuscript were not properly set. After 10 days of revisions, the chief editor accepted the revised manuscript on the same day. Thank you!
Throughout the process, I resisted the urge to rush the editors and waited patiently. Of course, during the process, I also experienced countless moments of anxiety and worry. JMPT Journal has high requirements for formatting, and the submitted paper must meet the journal's formatting requirements for review, even for revised manuscripts. I hope that those who submit to JMPT will patiently handle each formatting review comment from the editors and not dismiss them as insignificant.

Elec_tang 2021-03-14

Finally, put an end to it and complete the process behind!

2020.09.30 submitted to journal
2020.10.13 with editor
2020.10.19 under review
2020.12.19 required reviews completed
2020.12.20 with editor
2020.12.21 under review
2021.01.09 under review
2021.01.30 under review
2021.02.23 required reviews completed
2021.02.26 decision in process
2021.03.01 major revision
2021.03.10 with editor
2021.03.11 sent back to author
2021.03.12 with editor
2021.03.13 accept

科研临时工 2021-03-11

Generally, the first submission takes around 14 days with the editor for review.

SGLJ 2021-03-10

How long have you been using with editor? It has been 12 days.

金宇安 2021-03-07

Actually, it can be faster. The first review opinion system missed one reviewer's opinion, which caused me to go through a second review. JMPT is now very fast.

academic worker 2021-03-01

Yes... You are the fastest...

金宇安 2021-02-06

The first trial took 6 days, the second trial took 20 days, and I was hired one week after the third trial. May I ask if I am the fastest?

Elec_tang 2021-02-02

Hello, may I ask if you have been in the first review for 7 months? Have you been reminded to submit your manuscript during this process? I have now been in the first review for 5 months... Is it possible to be reviewed for half a year and then have the manuscript rejected? Thank you very much, sorry to bother you!