lilililili_ 2021-09-22

8.9 under review has changed to 8.31 under review, and there is still no update.

楠疯过境 2021-09-22

8.20 Submission
8.26 Under review
9.4 Under review
9.12 Under review
9.22 Under review
The date changed four times, and I don't know what's going on.

原原原原原原 2021-09-22

The journals in Zone 1 of Physical Chemistry Basics include EES, AM, AEM, AFM, and other journals. Zone 2 includes JMCA, Small, and almost exclusively materials-related journals. In the new classification system, these materials-related journals are categorized separately, and only then can they be considered Zone 1. Although this journal is mainly focused on chemistry, it also includes a significant number of materials-related articles, which are more pure than those in fields such as CEJ, which covers biochemistry and materials science. The impact factor is expected to continue to increase to over 15 in the next few years, and the acceptance rate is currently over 80%. Ideas should have a certain level of innovation, and figures and tables should be aesthetically pleasing. Language should be fluent with minimal grammar errors.

柔和的晚风 2021-09-21

August 11th submission
August 13th sent for review
August 21st status changed once
September 5th feedback received, five comments from one reviewer
September 11th resubmission
September 21st accepted (coincides with the Mid-Autumn Festival)
Overall, it was relatively fast, with an impact factor of 6.489.

Freud 2021-09-20

It has been 4 days in the editor's hands, how many more days will it take to receive review or rejection news?

tutujie 2021-09-20

It has been 12 days with my editor, and I still don't know what's going on. Why is it so slow?

tutujie 2021-09-20

It has been 12 days in the hands of the editor, I don't know what is going on. I see that other people are getting reviewed quickly. I also want to ask the original poster about the final outcome.

tutujie 2021-09-20

My editing has been with the editor for 12 days already. Seeing that other people are submitting quickly, I don't know what's going on. I'm also asking the original poster, what happened in the end?

云都 2021-09-20

Such a good journal, but it is classified as a second-tier journal in the basic version, and even a third-tier journal in the subcategory of physical chemistry. I wonder which journals are classified as first-tier in the field of physical chemistry. The classification of the Chinese Academy of Sciences is really amazing.

云都 2021-09-20

It seems like your language skills are indeed problematic and do not meet editing requirements. Just make some improvements, what's there to criticize?

nuly 2021-09-16

I want to know how to polish the summary and conclusion of this magazine. What are the requirements? All the reviewers have agreed, but the editor keeps asking for language revisions.

Long-FZU 2021-09-14

2021.08.07 Submit
2021.08.08 With editor
2021.08.09 Under Review
2021.08.15. Minor Revision
2021.08.24 Resubmission
2021.08.25 With Editor
2021.08.30 Accept
Special thanks to Prof. Zheng from Fudan University for providing professional and prompt responses! Wishing the journal continued success!

Try harder 2021-09-13

Submitted on July 9th, the manuscript was sent for review on the same day. The review process took around 20 days with six reviewers, resulting in five minor revisions and one major revision. The editor provided 45 days for modifications. The revised manuscript was uploaded by the end of August and on September 8th, the reviewers agreed to accept it. The editor requested three formatting changes for minor revisions on September 12th, and the revised manuscript was uploaded on September 13th. The editor accepted it directly. Overall, the entire process from submission to acceptance took approximately two months, which I personally find quite fast. The editor-in-chief is Prof. Martin Malmsten.

spliuyou 2021-09-13

2021.06.21 submitted, 2021.06.22 under review, 2021.08.05 received reviewer comments, one reviewer, 4 comments, major revisions requested, 45 days for resubmission, 2021.09.08 returned the manuscript in the evening, 2021.09.09 accepted in the evening, the editor's processing speed is amazing, coincided with Teacher's Day, the advisor said it's the best gift for Teacher's Day, hoping to receive such Teacher's Day gifts every year in the future!

baobao-xiaowang 2021-09-07

Real-time impact factor 6.3, JPS is 6.0. However, JCIS has published articles in WOS ahead of time, so the impact factor may have changed. This year, a score of 9 should not be a big problem.

SPD 2021-09-06

8.4 submit
8.17 minor revision, 2 reviewers
8.27 revise
9.5 accept
Thank you, editor Max Lu, for the fast review process.

lilililili_ 2021-09-01

The text "9号显示under view 前面打错了" translates to "I made a mistake before. It should be under view on the 9th."

lilililili_ 2021-09-01

Translate the following text into English:
"2号显示under view 现在状态日期变动到了31号 但还是under view 有木有伙伴知道什么情况啊"

"On the 2nd, it shows 'under view.' The current status date has changed to the 31st, but it is still 'under view.' Does anyone know what's going on?"

aarro 2021-08-31

There shouldn't be any problem with the normal Zone 1, but now with this magical zone, who knows. It's around 6 o'clock in real time.

原原原原原原 2021-08-31

Which classmate can provide the latest Instant IF report? Can you predict the IF for 2021? Is there a chance it will reach 9.5 or even 10? Can the new version of this Zone 1 stabilize in December this year? Is there a chance for the old version to also move up to Zone 1? I don't know if the article's innovation has improved, but one thing is for sure, the graphics are becoming more and more impressive.

王路飞 2021-08-26

Thank you to Teresa J. Bandosz for editing, the processing speed was very fast.

王路飞 2021-08-26

6.30 submit to journal
7.1 with editor
7.2 under review
7.20 Three reviewers, two minor revisions, one major revision
8.18 revision
8.19 with editor
8.21 under review
8.25 accept
The process was quite fast, I myself procrastinated for almost a month.

bibobian 2021-08-23

6.13 submission being processed
6.14 with editor
6.15 under review
7.28 under review (reminder sent once)
8.23 rejected
It seems that three reviewers were invited, but only one provided feedback suggesting major revisions, which the editor rejected. It's quite a long process. Just for your reference.

pre致信 2021-08-22

Oh, this reviewer 3, I doubt that they didn't review carefully or even understand it. Among the comments from reviewer 3, some are related to XPS. I specifically consulted more knowledgeable people and compared with standard databases. They said there was nothing wrong with mine and refuted the opinion of this reviewer. I don't know who reviewed it anyway, but it just feels like their comments are vague and unprofessional. Take this as an example, you all can refer to it...

pre致信 2021-08-18

7.22 Submitted to Journal
7.23 With Editor
7.25 Under Review
8.5 Under Review
8.16 Required Review Completed
8.17 Reject

The review process was indeed fast and did not take much time. When submitting, there was no need to select an editor as it was automatically assigned. The rejection letter did not mention which editor it was. After the review, only the comments from Reviewer 3 were provided. There were a total of 4 points, some of which seemed vague and far-fetched. It is possible that there was a change in reviewers or that Reviewers 1 and 2 had conflicting opinions and Reviewer 3 acted as an arbitrator. It is also possible that the review process was normal and only the editor had changed. Unfortunately, the opinions of Reviewers 1 and 2 were not included, which was quite unexpected. In any case, I am grateful for the opportunity to submit and would like to share my personal experience for reference. Please refrain from negative comments.

tujia213 2021-08-14

This magazine has a good quality, and the most praiseworthy aspect is its speed, which is really very fast!
On July 6th, the manuscript was uploaded in the morning; in the evening, it was directly submitted for review.
On July 16th, the required reviews were completed.
On July 22nd, there was a major revision with four reviewers and over 30 questions, which was very helpful for improving the details.
On August 4th, the revised manuscript was submitted to the journal.
On August 5th, it was with the editor.
On August 13th, it was accepted.
Thanks to the editor-in-chief, Prof. Martin Malmsten, who is really very efficient. This is also the reason why JCIS is so fast!

Forcee 2021-08-12

Submitted on June 29th, the paper underwent a major revision, and the reviewer's comments were uploaded on August 2nd. It was accepted on August 12th. Three reviewers and the editor provided constructive and professional feedback. This is my second SCI paper for my master's degree (the first one being in STOTEN). I hope the third paper will also have such a quick pace. Finally, I would like to express my gratitude to editor Teresa J. Bandosz.

lilililili_ 2021-08-11

Number 2 is in the hands of the editor, and number 9 is showing "under view." I don't know if it has been submitted for review or not.

知否 2021-08-10

Classmate, how long have you been waiting for approval?

lilililili_ 2021-08-07

How long after will it be reviewed?