朝朝@ 2022-12-09

Personally, I feel that MDPI is doing a good job compared to other publishing houses in terms of review quality and revision process. The academic editors are responsible and will attentively help correct some issues. It's like comparing Haidilao, Ziqi Hotpot, and other well-known reputable restaurants. If you think your article is mediocre, then there's no need to submit it. You can freely submit to those classic, high-quality top journals.

朝朝@ 2022-12-09

You probably wouldn't say so if you were hired, brother.

chifan 2022-12-03

This trash magazine is still around, producing over ten thousand articles a year, hiring some clueless undergraduate students to flatter certain corrupt schools and individuals, publishing some meaningless junk articles, and still managing to secure a spot in the warning periodical through public relations. Truly a foul and unbearable garbage.

huifeideshuwu 2022-11-30

Received minor revision notification one month after submission, with comments from three reviewers who were very professional. After making the minor revisions, the paper was accepted directly. It is a very good journal. Many journals reject papers even after 4-6 months of submission. This journal is good because it provides quick results, regardless of acceptance or rejection, without wasting valuable time for researchers.

薛定谔没有猫1 2022-11-16

I would like to ask, it has been two days since I submitted the revised version for the second round of major review. Is it normal that I haven't received any response from Monday afternoon at 4 o'clock until now?

薛定谔没有猫1 2022-11-16

I would like to ask, it has been more than two days since my article underwent major revisions R2 and the second round of Revised Version Review. Is it normal to have no response yet? I have replied to the reviewer very seriously, and I am worried that my level is not enough, so I asked my supervisor to help me review it.

薛定谔没有猫1 2022-11-16

I have submitted my second round of major revisions. It has been two days since the revised version was reviewed. Is this normal?

ajoax 2022-11-16

It's been 8 days for mine, still pending. What about yours?

冲鸭加油鸭 2022-11-12

I also submitted my application only four days ago and it has not been reviewed yet.

天天开心 2022-11-11

Just want to ask, how long did your pending review last before moving to the next step?

冲鸭加油鸭 2022-11-11

I have been voting for three days and it's still the same.

天天开心 2022-11-11

I would like to ask, if a submission is pending review for three days, how long does this state usually last for everyone?

投稿路上的凡 2022-11-04

"Do I need to submit a cover letter for the submission of my manuscript?"

冲鸭加油鸭 2022-11-03

How to submit original data for the materials category?

enennnnn 2022-11-03

The requirements are quite strict, and the submission of original film and other data is required.

enennnnn 2022-11-03

Publishing two to three thousand articles per year is not considered a large volume for a comprehensive magazine.

enennnnn 2022-11-03

I submitted the article but I don't know if it will be accepted. I saw that the requirements are quite strict, as they require uploading original data such as graphs and so on.

enennnnn 2022-11-03

Where did you see that there were 20,000 articles published in a year? It is quite normal for a journal to have a publication volume of only 4,500 to 5,000 articles in the past two years.

冲鸭加油鸭 2022-11-03

May I ask if this journal requires the submission of raw data?

5520sdc 2022-10-12

The reviewer is quite serious and the opinions are also reasonable.

桔梗花 2022-10-12

Garbage magazines are published every year, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences still does not issue warnings, which means that the research environment is about to deteriorate. Many people around me are just posting nonsense on those magazines, and they get so much pleasure from award evaluations and professional titles. Are you not annoyed when you see that your publication's impact factor is still lower than his?

科研狗~~ 2022-10-09

This magazine is obviously a money-making magazine, also a magazine that many desperate graduates rely on. The quality is worrisome, and peer reviews are often fake. We frequently receive emails from reviewers asking authors to write their own review comments. With such a large number of articles published each year, it is estimated that it will soon be under warning signs!!!!

chifan 2022-09-30

This LJ journal has reached 20,000 articles per year. The quality is really not commendable. The public relations ability is really strong. It should be included in the warning journals.

feilongchen 2022-09-20

Delivered, employed after major revision. It took more than 2 months. The journal's speed is very fast.

学术社恐 2022-09-19

2022-08-01 Submit
2022-08-02 Under Review
2022-08-22 Major Revisions-Round 1
2022-08-31 Revised Version Received
2022-09-02 Major Revisions-Round 2
2022-09-09 Revised Version Received
2022-09-10 Pending Editor Decision
2022-09-19 Paper accepted

Just one word, hurry! I hope I can hold on, there's too much workload for publishing and I'm scared~~

123木头人 2022-09-19

Hello, I would like to ask, how is the approximate cost calculated?

丑小鸭 2022-09-16

4.27 Submit
5.10 Major Revision - Requested to conduct additional experiments
5.20 Resubmit - Unable to conduct experiments due to the pandemic, explained and resubmitted
5.23 Major Revision - Reviewers insist on conducting additional experiments, had to explain the need for extension to the editor
8.3 Resubmit
8.5 Minor Revision
8.9 Resubmit
8.13 Accept
Overall, the peer review process was fast, but the publication fee is expensive. The reviewers requested the submission of the original Western blot images. It was not possible to deceive the reviewers with incomplete experiments. Therefore, the peer review process was relatively formal. However, is a 10-day major revision period sufficient?

他是木头1997 2022-09-15

Does it matter if the corresponding author is not a doctor?

cd_0516 2022-09-09

On September 9, 2002, received.

房间爱打我 2022-09-07

It is really fast, but it is also really expensive.