认证评论 - International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

llfzu 2022-05-03

I want to ask how to check the status of a submission? I seem to be unable to see them.

Lara Li 2022-04-23

I would like to ask, does anyone know why the "guide for author" link is showing "not found"? Where can I find the journal's formatting requirements? Thank you.

GeoCarto 2022-04-21

The speed is very fast, and the specific timeline is as follows:
January 9, 2022, submission
January 10, 2022, under review
February 22, 2022, first decision
February 25, 2022, major revision, given 20 days
March 12, 2022, revised, quickly resubmitted, experts quickly provided feedback (within two days), then second decision
March 22, 2022, minor revision, given two weeks
April 2, 2022, revised, quickly directly accepted
April 5, 2022, accepted.

liu6677 2022-04-18

The editor-in-chief is very responsible and the review speed is very fast. Basically, it is processed as soon as it is submitted, and most of the reviews are done at night. The first submission was rejected due to excessive word count, and it was resubmitted after modification. In the first review, there were three reviewers, two major revisions, and one minor revision. The reviewers' opinions were professional and it took half a month to reply with over 6000 words of modifications. In the second review, there were three reviewers in the same group, two minor revisions, and one recommendation for acceptance. The acceptance letter was sent on the same day of submission after the minor revisions. The whole process took around one and a half months. Highly recommend submitting to this journal. The specific timeline is as follows:

- 2.26: First submission
- 2.27: Rejected
- 3.3: Resubmission, under review on the same day
- 3.12: Required review completed, after four days, it changed back to under review because another reviewer was invited, possibly due to the first reviewer's minor revisions and the second reviewer's major revisions.
- 3.22: Required review completed again, first review's major revisions were returned.
- 4.1: Revisions
- 4.14: Minor revisions
- 4.18: Revisions, accepted on the same day.

魔与竭 2022-04-11

Translate the following text into English:
"Invitation for special issue submissions in February, probably casting a wide net;
Submission deadline: March 20th;
With editor on March 26th;
Decision in process as of April 4th;
It's probably not looking good."

sunshineyin 2022-03-29

Helped someone submit an article.

2021-05-31: Submitted
2021-09-17: Major Revision
2021-12-15: Minor Revision
2021-12-22: Accepted

lvda8811 2022-02-18

2021/10/14 submitted
2021/10/15 Format issue, resubmitted
2021/12/3 Two reviewers, one of them very negative, suggested rejection, but the editor gave major revisions; originally given a two-cycle limit, we asked for an additional two weeks;
2021/12/31 Returned
2022/2/2 Rejected; the same reviewer as before suggested rejection

等结果ing 2022-02-09

The overall submission efficiency is fast. It takes about a month and a half from submission, revision, to acceptance. The reviewers' opinions are very fair and greatly contribute to the improvement of the article.
The editor-in-chief is responsible, and the influence of the open-access journal has also significantly increased. This year it has already reached the top rank in Zone 1. I wish the journal continued success and improvement.

WHU_RS 2021-12-09

The first trial takes two months, and then there is a major revision. The second trial still takes two months, and then there is a minor revision. After one month of the minor revision, the offer is made, which feels a bit slow.

没有名字_无名 2021-11-21

Which one is better, this journal or IEEE TGRS?

baily 2021-11-20

Hello, may I ask if this journal is chargeable?

哒哒chersh 2021-09-26

The editing and review process is very efficient, and the quality of the paper has greatly improved after one round of revisions. The paper was submitted for review on the second day, and the first review took more than 20 days. The second review took 8 days, and then after three days, the acceptance notice was received. It is a good journal, and I recommend everyone to submit their papers there!

luckyyang 2021-09-08

Generally speaking, the manuscript processing speed is relatively fast. If the quality is not good, it will be instantly rejected by the editor. The initial review takes more than 2 months, and major revisions are completed within 20 days. Minor revisions take about 15 days to return. The second review takes one month, and minor revisions take about a week to modify. After returning, it is accepted on the same afternoon.

The editor-in-chief is very responsible and also participates in the review process. The opinions are very rigorous and professional. The revisions need to be taken seriously. A large amount of experimental data has been added during the process. The journal has a good reputation, and I hope it will continue to improve.

who are you 2021-08-22

The theme is about the development of new remote sensing products. From submission to acceptance, there was only one major revision. The first review took 2 months to notify the results. There were 3 reviewers, and their opinions were very professional and meticulous. It was almost rejected. We spent two months making revisions and replying with more than 10,000 words of feedback. In total, it took 6 months, which felt a bit slow in terms of speed.

HNUST 2021-07-01

2021 latest impact factor 5.933

125840yy 2021-06-30

It was a difficult journal, and I had four reviewers. The Associate Editor, acting as one of the reviewers, provided separate review comments. Although it was rejected, all the opinions were very professional and authoritative, greatly improving the quality of the article. After carefully revising it, I submitted it to another journal.

successful 2021-06-29

The translation of the text into English is as follows: "I was lucky. I submitted to ISPRS and then got recommended to JAG. They gave me minor revisions, and after making the changes, my paper was accepted. The whole process took one and a half months. The reviewers were very nice and gave excellent suggestions. It's a good journal. Hopefully, it will have an impact factor above 5 this year."

童童的年 2021-02-02

September 28, 2020 - Submitted
December 13, 2020 - Major revision
January 21, 2021 - Revised
January 30, 2021 - Accepted

Overall efficiency is high. Due to other matters, the article was returned for revision only one week before the deadline. After incorporating the suggestions from the reviewers, the quality of the article has significantly improved.

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started