GeoRser 2023-08-02

How long does the state of "with editor" last?

GeoRser 2023-08-02

May I ask how the current situation is?

gaojian11111 2023-07-25

It has been a week since submission, and the status has always been "With Editor". It has not entered peer review. Does anyone know what's going on?

沧海一粒沙 2023-07-24

May I ask how much is the layout fee for this journal?

XDU-小学徒 2023-07-12

First day of submission, second day rejected and transferred to another journal (recommended journal: Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, currently unranked, absurd). Overall feeling: high requirements (strict format, high innovation, not inferior to TGRS), large number of submissions, fast review process, high rejection rate (around 80%, current number of submissions is 1800).

hhhoops 2023-06-29

My status has never changed.

hhh2023 2023-06-29

Does the changing time of "under review" mean that no reviewers have been found? My time also changes every day.

hhh2023 2023-06-29

I want to ask, when your paper is under review, does the date keep changing? Lately, I have been seeing its status change every day. Does that mean it has been rejected by the reviewer?

hhhyhw 2023-06-27

During my master's program, I would like to share the timeline of my second thesis submission:
May 4, 2023: Submitted the paper
May 5, 2023: Rejection (Reason: The similarity rate exceeded 30%, and the journal did not provide a plagiarism report. After checking myself, I found that it was mainly due to excessive use of technical terms, author affiliations, funding names, formula symbols, and the names of data sources.)
May 6, 2023: Resubmitted after reducing the similarity rate to below 10%
May 7, 2023: Under review
May 15, 2023: Major revision (Received feedback from two reviewers, one suggesting minor revisions and the other suggesting major revisions. The feedback was professional and to the point. The editor asked for major revisions and provided a 20-day timeframe for modification.)
June 5, 2023: Submitted the major revisions
June 6, 2023: Under review
June 14, 2023: Minor revision (Received feedback from the same two reviewers, one recommending acceptance and the other asking for further clarification. The feedback was professional and to the point. The editor asked for minor revisions.)
June 16, 2023: Submitted the minor revisions
June 19, 2023: Under review
June 25, 2023: Accepted (Finally satisfied the reviewer with concerns and got acceptance)
June 26, 2023: Final proofreading
It was a good journal with quick editorial processing. The review process took only one to two weeks, and the whole submission to acceptance process took less than two months. The efficiency was very high! I wish everyone success in getting their papers accepted!

BrickDanD 2023-06-26

Take note:
Submitted on the evening of June 25th with the editor.

十三颗星星 2023-06-25

2022-12-16 Submit
2023-02-15 Major Revision
2023-03-31 Submit
2023-03-30 Minor Revision
2023-03-31 Submit
2023-04-27 Accept

Translated into English:
2022-12-16: Submit
2023-02-15: Major Revision
2023-03-31: Submit
2023-03-30: Minor Revision
2023-03-31: Submit
2023-04-27: Accept

good-y 2023-06-09

Does the word count limit include line numbers and authorship contribution?

good-y 2023-06-09

I would like to ask if the 8000 characters include line numbers as well.

good-y 2023-06-09

Hello, I would like to ask, does 8000 characters count as a line number? The line number also takes up several hundred characters.

poly123 2023-06-03

6.3 under review in English means that something with a value or measurement of 6.3 is currently being evaluated or examined.

poly123 2023-06-02

6.2 Submission, reviewed by the editor that evening.

kyxtm 2023-05-11

On October 5th, after three rounds of reviewing, it was finally accepted. Don't be afraid of negative comments from reviewers, there is hope if you make the required changes. The report I read lacked reference plagiarism check.

huilin16 2023-05-08

May I ask if your plagiarism detection rate includes references?

huilin16 2023-05-08

May I ask if your plagiarism rate includes the references? In the end, how much did it decrease to?

huilin16 2023-05-08

Does your plagiarism detection rate also include references?

huilin16 2023-05-08

May I ask if your plagiarism detection rate includes the references as well?

卡夫卡漫步 2023-04-11

It is best to keep it around 10. I was rejected when I was 12, so let's continue to lower it.

Yang Bojin 2023-04-09

Does the plagiarism rate include references?

小猫mmm 2023-04-09

May I ask what is the passing rate for the plagiarism check?

卡夫卡漫步 2023-04-08

2022.09.17 Submission
Rejected on the same day: The reason is that the word count exceeded 8000, the abstract exceeded 250 words, the similarity check did not pass, and highlights were not submitted.
2022.09.19 Resubmitted after revision
2022.09.27 Under review
2022.10.19 Updated status: Under review
2022.11.15 Updated status: Under review, sent a reminder letter and the editor replied that it is in the review process
2022.12.09 Updated status: Under review
2023.01.07 Updated status: Under review
2023.02.27 Received feedback, major revision requested, provided 14 days for revision
2023.03.13 Revised with significant experimental changes and resubmitted
2023.03.15 Under review
2023.04.08 Accepted
For the past six months, no reviewers were found, so the editor participated in the review process upon resubmission. Only one reviewer provided five comments, which were few but very professional and targeted. After making the revisions, the quality of the manuscript significantly improved. Best wishes for the continuous improvement of the journal.

accccept 2023-04-06

The word count is the total number of words, and I'm not sure about the specific plagiarism rate. My first attempt was 18%, but it wasn't acceptable.

accccept 2023-04-06

2022.12.16 Submission
2022.12.17 Rejected: The reason is that the word count exceeds 8000, the abstract exceeds 250, the similarity check failed, and no highlights were submitted.
2022.12.18 Resubmitted after revision
2022.12.20 Under review
2023.02.07 Returned with major revisions, provided 21 days for modification
2023.02.28 Returned for major revisions
2023.03.10 Returned with minor revisions, two reviewers have no comments, and one reviewer has three comments
2023.03.14 Returned for minor revisions
2023.03.15 Status changed to "with editor" once
2023.03.16 Under review: Review invitations sent: 1; Review invitations accepted: 0
2023.03.30 Accepted!!!

Yang Bojin 2023-04-04

May I ask how low the plagiarism rate can be reduced?

一个跻身科研大浪的小白 2023-04-02

10.24: Submitted
10.25: Under review
2.8: Major Revision (Two reviewers provided positive feedback: one suggesting major revisions, and the other suggesting minor revisions)
2.26: Revised
2.27: Under review
3.14: Minor Revision (One reviewer has four additional questions that need clarification)
3.27: Revised, with editor
3.31: Accepted without further review, process completed
The editorial handling was prompt, and they continuously invited new reviewers. The reviewers were very professional and identified issues accurately, greatly improving the article. Highly recommended for submission!

杨小小 2023-03-30

May I ask how is the acceptance rate for journal submissions? Is the review process lengthy? Can it be accepted within 6 months under normal circumstances?