PaperSeeker 2022-01-03

Could I ask the original poster how they decided to choose AE when submitting their article? Did they choose someone they know or just select randomly? And during the review process, is it always the AE they selected themselves?

我是猫 2021-12-21

2021.8.12 initial submission
2021.10.5 major revision
2021.10.25 submit the revised version
2021.11.29 with associate editor
2021.12.10 minor revision
2021.12.11 submit the revised version
2021.12.14 with associate editor
2021.12.15 minor revision(but no comments???)
2021.12.18 submit the revised version
2021.12.20 with associate editor
2021.12.21 accepted

Translation:
2021.8.12: Initial submission
2021.10.5: Major revision
2021.10.25: Submit the revised version
2021.11.29: With associate editor
2021.12.10: Minor revision
2021.12.11: Submit the revised version
2021.12.14: With associate editor
2021.12.15: Minor revision (but no comments???)
2021.12.18: Submit the revised version
2021.12.20: With associate editor
2021.12.21: Accepted

researcher_china 2021-04-08

Initial submission: 02-Oct-2020
Received major revisions: 16-Dec-2020
I took a break to help my boss write a project proposal, so there was a gap of one month.
Submit the revised version: 01-Feb-2021
Received minor revisions: 10-Mar-2021
I took a break to write my master's thesis, so there was a gap of over ten days.
Submit the revised version: 23-Mar-2021
Accepted as a regular paper: 02-Apr-2021
There were three reviewers, and the review process with the Associate Editor took about a week.

biyisi 2021-03-19

2020.12.29 submit
2021.2.17 reject
Four reviewers, minor revision, major revision, reject, reject.
Reject comment 1: Did not open up new chapters in the field. (crying while laughing)
Reject comment 2: Lacks breakthrough results. (crying while laughing)
CCF A journal is really difficult.