认证评论 - IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

pegn 2021-09-08

A very good journal, focuses on experimental analysis and top publications in the field of information measurement.

cluo 2021-09-08

How is the classification of this journal?

cluo 2021-09-08

Top journals in electronic information and measurement, it's not easy to get one published.

ZHAO J C 2021-09-08

Submitted on July 13th, returned for modification and resubmission due to non-compliance with journal formatting requirements; resubmitted on July 17th after modifications; under review since July 23rd; major revision requested on August 30th, with a 21-day time period given for modifications; completed revisions submitted on September 7th, unknown outcome.

cdy666 2021-09-08

2021.1.17, Submission;
2021.3.11, Received revision comments, major revision, 3 weeks for modifications;
2021.6.19, Received revision comments again, minor revision, 2 weeks for modifications;
2021.8.12, Accepted and sent final image materials.

洛洛222 2021-08-31

First round: Three reviewers, two of whom provided many professional opinions, while one reviewer who is not in the field gave a lot of random opinions. The paper was rejected and resubmitted. It took one month to receive the feedback.

Second round: Three reviewers, two of whom had no major opinions, while the last person gave obviously incorrect suggestions. The paper was rejected. It took one month to receive the feedback.

Appeal: The third reviewer had obvious issues. The editor quickly changed the decision to acceptance.

May I ask: Is it necessary to include the names in our native language for the final submission? Can we omit them?

洛洛222 2021-08-31

Do I have to write my native name?

xssjtu 2021-08-31

2021.6 Submission
Feedback expected by the end of July for major revision (three weeks for revisions)
Revised in mid-August, required reviews completed one week later, and accepted directly one week after that.
The submission process was relatively fast this time. I hope TIM continues to improve.

Adonijahh 2021-08-17

2021.6.4 submission - Submitted on June 4, 2021
2021.7.12 major revision - Major revision requested on July 12, 2021
2021.7.28 revised - Revised on July 28, 2021
2021.8.16 accepted - Accepted on August 16, 2021
During my undergraduate period, this is my fourth SCI paper. It is in a niche field and is considered a top publication. Being a representative work, it is very good.

sanctitude 2021-08-14

Yes, I have seen articles in this journal that are like this, with the English name (Chinese name).

cdy666 2021-08-14

Could you please clarify if you have encountered this suggestion: "authors must provide the native language name in unicode characters to be displayed in the byline of the article, in parentheses, after the English version of the name." What does this mean? Should the Chinese name be directly written after the English name?

cdy666 2021-08-14

Hello, may I ask the original poster, what does the editorial department mean by "Authors must provide the native language name in Unicode characters to be displayed in the byline of the article, in parentheses, after the English version of the name."? Do they mean to directly write the Chinese name after the English name?

ye2019 2021-08-12

My "under review" status has changed back and forth 8-9 times already, and it's still in the "under review" state. It's been almost two months now, and I see that most people get their results within a month. Sigh, I wish they would reject it sooner.

天高云淡654 2021-08-12

In the thesis, also create a new folder to send.

李小虫子 2021-08-11

Why did you vote again if it doesn't fit the criteria? Is the editor's criteria very broad in scope?

镜中人2021 2021-08-11

Can anyone share what materials are required to be submitted after being hired? Should the author's information and photo be placed directly after the paper or in a separate file? Thank you.

风之小翼 2021-08-10

May I ask what the result is now?

sanctitude 2021-08-06

I guess there is no need to submit it to the reviewer again, the editor can make the decision directly. I just made some minor revisions, hoping for good luck.

小法师wjl 2021-08-04

How long did it take for you to return after the major repair?

天高云淡654 2021-08-03

Does everyone have this situation? What is the usual result of this situation?

LIU654 2021-08-03

After minor revisions, it was not submitted for review. Now it is "Decision in Process," feeling nervous~

scccsccc 2021-08-02

Do you have a submission template? I couldn't find it on the official website. Is there a Word template available?

没有感情的论文机器 2021-08-02

The change in date indicates that the reviewers have either accepted or rejected the invitation to review. The process of inviting reviewers is also included in the "under review" process.

Mz.DAFA 2021-08-01

Just to add, it was sent for external review on July 28th. What's the situation with the date changing every day?

Mz.DAFA 2021-08-01

Brothers, the submission was under review on 7.28. The current date keeps changing every day. What's the situation? Is it still in the early hours of the morning (AM)?

beyondzoey 2021-07-30

2021.3.17 - Submit initial draft
2021.4.17 - Under review
2021.5.29 - Major revision
2021.6.18 - Resubmit
2021.7.15 - Accept
Thank you to my laboratory colleagues for their guidance and support during the testing process!

sanctitude 2021-07-29

Will the manuscript be sent to the reviewer again after submitting a minor revision, or will it be sufficient for the editor to review it? Thank you.

m22 2021-07-29

Hello, I also received a rejection and was asked to resubmit. However, the opinions of three experts all suggest that the contribution is limited. In this situation, is there still hope to make some changes and resubmit?

sanctitude 2021-07-28

Of course, when submitting, didn't they ask you to sign the superpage agreement?

斗破苍穹 2021-07-28

Will I be charged if the number of pages in my paper exceeds the journal's specified page limit?

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started