认证评论 - IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

ZHAO J C 2022-03-04

Still waiting for the result, feeling anxious. It is an ongoing job, unsure if I can succeed again.

77不要香菜 2022-03-01

After two months of review, with four reviewers, three of them proposed some modifications, while one rejected it for lacking novelty. The editor rejected it as well. Sigh, in the end, I am not qualified. Now I am worried that I won't be able to graduate.

小龙小龙 2022-03-01

First revision is a major overhaul, aiming to improve the quality of the image. The file size is limited to 20m for the initial submission. Is there still a size restriction for the revised manuscript? Is the revised manuscript in PDF or TEX format? All esteemed individuals.

LX654321lx 2022-02-28

2.20 send back to author - This means that something is being returned to the original writer.
2.21 submitted - This indicates that something has been handed in or turned in.
2.26 with editor - This suggests that something is currently being reviewed or worked on by an editor.

OvvO 2022-02-28

Feb 22, 2022, Manuscript Submitted
Feb 28, 2022, Send back to author
Feb 28, 2022, Manuscript Submitted

鱼子酱炒饭 2022-02-24

An article on practical engineering applications of deep learning was submitted to a highly efficient journal. Results are expected within approximately 20 days.

Timeline for reference:
Submission in mid-November 2021,
Rejection in mid-December 2021 (recommendation for resubmission, equivalent to major revisions),
Return by the end of December 2021 (if revisions are completed before 21 days),
Minor revisions returned by the end of January 2022,
Acceptance in early February 2022, currently awaiting proof.

光学小硕 2022-02-23

During this period, there were some status changes.
Dec 7, 2021, 1:11 AM - Under Review
Dec 9, 2021, 12:51 AM - Under Review
Dec 10, 2021, 1:44 AM - Under Review
Dec 13, 2021, 2:23 AM - Under Review

光学小硕 2022-02-23

Posted on November 10, 2021, first review took two months, received feedback on January 14, 2022, major revision required, given 21 days.
Returned on February 4, 2022, simultaneously submitted Mark version and clean version were rejected by the editor, only need to upload the marked version and response letter.
Resubmitted on February 7, 2022, currently under review, it has been reviewed for over half a month with unknown results.
Nov 10, 2021 12:26AM Submitted
Dec 3, 2021 1:32AM Under Review
Dec 14, 2021 1:57AM Under Review
Jan 14, 2022 2:05AM Decision in Process
Jan 14, 2022 5:07AM Major Revision
Feb 7, 2022 9:15AM Revision Complete
Feb 7, 2022 12:15AM Under Review
Feb 14, 2022 1:51AM Under Review

骑猪闯世界 2022-02-23

Submission Experience:
Submitted manuscript → Received rejection with invitation to resubmit (equivalent to major revision) 27 days later → Received major revision invitation 31 days after resubmission → Received minor revision invitation 18 days after resubmission → Received acceptance 4 days later.

From submission to acceptance, it took about 4 months, including the time for revisions. Overall, the review process was quite fast, and the Associate Editor was very helpful, giving multiple opportunities for resubmission. The reviewers' feedback was also very professional.

我是冷锋 2022-02-22

2021.11.02 Submission
2021.11.22 Rejected and resubmitted (similar to major revision)
2022.01.23 Submitted revised manuscript
2022.02.09 Minor revision
2022.02.15 Resubmitted minor revision
2022.02.18 Three words were lost when copying the title, editor requested a resubmission, made the modifications and submitted on the same day.
2022.02.22 Accepted.

Overall impression: The editor is really nice, three reviewers, and they are very professional, especially the third reviewer, whose comments were very helpful for improving my paper! The first round of revisions had a total of 84 comments, and I felt like giving up when I saw them (crying), but I wrote a 50-page response. I included many explanatory videos as well.

MarQ 2022-02-21

2022.02.18 manuscript submitted
2022.02.19 manuscript submitted
2022.02.20 manuscript submitted
2022.02.21 manuscript submitted

MarQ 2022-02-21

2022.02.17 manuscript submitted

Translation: The manuscript was submitted on February 17th, 2022.

MarQ 2022-02-21

2022.02.16 manuscript submitted

Translation: The manuscript has been submitted on February 16, 2022.

LX654321lx 2022-02-20

2022 Feb14 submitted
Feb15 submitted
Feb16 submitted
Feb 17submitted
Feb18 submitted
Feb19 submitted
Feb20 submitted

Translated:

2022 February 14th submitted
February 15th submitted
February 16th submitted
February 17th submitted
February 18th submitted
February 19th submitted
February 20th submitted

光学小硕 2022-02-18

Can a manuscript be rejected and resubmitted after major revisions during the first review? I just submitted my manuscript for major revisions, and the email stated that if it requires major revisions again during the second review, it will be automatically rejected. Have you encountered this situation?

qingshaa 2022-02-18

1. Four days after resubmission without the superpage protocol (protocol: https://ieee-ims.org/publication/ieee-tim/authors), resubmission was made. Three days later, it was with the editor. It took about a month for major revisions, and 20 days for the revised version to be sent back. After rejection, it was resubmitted.

2. Four days after resubmission, it was with the editor. One day later, it was under reviewer. After 13 days, Required Reviews were completed. One day later, the decision was in process. After nearly two weeks, it required major revisions. After 5 days, the revised version was sent back. After 20 days, minor revisions were made (with gratitude). One week later, it was revised again. Finally, it was accepted after one month.

3. Submitted during the second half of the year, it went through holidays such as Christmas and New Year, as well as the pandemic. The review process may have slight differences, but overall, it was already quite fast. Thank you once again.

杨恩维 2022-02-12

1.11 manuscript submitted
1.17 sent back to author - There is a problem with the cover page agreement, and the manuscript lacks author information (I thought it needed to be double-blind). Resubmitted on the same day.
1.17 manuscript submitted
1.24 with editor - Returned for revisions on the same day, given one week to make changes. Reason: did not reference a journal in the field of IM (Information Management). Added a few more comparative experiments as I felt the workload was a bit light. Submitted three days later.
1.29 with editor
2.5 under review
2.6 under review
2.6 under review
2.7 under review
2.7 under review
2.8 under review
Hope the subsequent process goes smoothly.

Thzhang 2022-02-01

Submitted in August 2021, accepted in February 2022.

coolcool 2022-01-22

May I ask, how long did it take for you to receive the employment information in the end?

After the minor adjustments, we went directly into the editing decision-making stage. Can you give me an idea of how long it takes to get the results? We have been waiting for the decision for three days now.

hit林海 2022-01-18

I don't know. Does the submission system mention the deadline for major revisions?

Tiam@YYL 2022-01-17

Excuse me, the deadline for the major repair it has given is not written. Do I need to send an email to ask the editor?

Tiam@YYL 2022-01-17

May I ask what does "N/A" mean in the reply email from the editor, as it was not written in the "revision due" section of the submission interface?

cool 2022-01-17

Excuse me, if I submit a revised manuscript, do I need to upload both the manuscript and the response? Should the revised parts in the manuscript be highlighted with different colors, or should I just submit an unmarked manuscript?

ZHAO J C 2022-01-13

Within twenty days, I had to make three revisions. The editor was really patient. Thank you.

智能和机械 2022-01-13

After the minor adjustments, we will directly enter the editing decision-making stage. May I ask how long it will take to get the results? We have been waiting for the decision for three days already.

123-654 2022-01-10

It can be considered as a major revision!

darren_heu 2022-01-07

That's right, the current Tim editor is really great, sincerely thumbs up.

秦国小子 2022-01-07

My journal interface is rejection, but the email says it's a rejection and resubmission. Does this mean a major revision?

ZHAO J C 2022-01-05

The editor is very patient. He sent it back to me twice within ten days for me to make changes.

ZHAO J C 2022-01-05

The manuscript has been returned because the cover letter mentioned that this article is a continuation of a previous article (already published) in the same journal. The editor has requested me to upload the mentioned paper as a supplementary file in the submission system.

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search