认证评论 - IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
Albort 2022-07-09
Why invest in this journal in the field of robotics? The electrical engineering of tro and tac is light years away from this journal.
hanhaha 2022-07-06
The provided link leads to the webpage of the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) for browsing electronic journals.
hanhaha 2022-07-06
The account of the submission system is the corresponding author, and if accepted, it will be indicated as "corresponding author: xxx" in the footer of the homepage.
The One 2022-07-05
I have made annotations in the manuscript, but I couldn't find a specific place to specify within the system. Let's see if there are any experts who can answer.
蜗牛冒个泡 2022-07-04
Excuse me, I have a question. During the TIE submission process, I did not fill in the space for the corresponding author. Could you please let me know where to add the corresponding author?
yfzhang 2022-07-04
Yesterday, the status just changed to under review.
在读博士,求PE 2022-07-04
Excuse me, are you still in AE?
菲文菲 2022-06-30
May 1st, initial review for major repairs.
June 1st, revised.
June 3rd, assigned to AE.
July 1st, under review.
yfzhang 2022-06-22
After review, the status changed to "assigned to AE" one week later. Currently, it has been one and a half months since it was assigned to AE, and I don't know the current situation.
Gomendy 2022-06-22
It's normal. The submission made in mid-March is still under review. However, the handling by the EIC (Editor-in-Chief) and AE (Associate Editor) is prompt.
HIT涵 2022-06-21
Submitted on April 16th
Under review around April 19th
Currently waiting for the result of the first review.
陌路无悔 2022-06-18
2022.01.17 Submit
2022.03.13 Major Revisions Four reviewers, over thirty questions, most of which are very professional, 6 weeks to revise
2022.04.07 Resubmit Officially processed on April 1st, addressed each point of feedback, returned within one week, 10-page revision explanation
2022.05.17 Major Revisions Only one reviewer had four minor concerns, but the associate editor still requested major revisions, which can actually be considered minor revisions
2022.05.20 Resubmit Three days to revise
2022.06.15 Accept
Overall, the speed and professionalism of IEEE TIE's review process are beyond reproach, with the "Awaiting AE Recomdation" stage lasting about a week.
帝鎷 2022-06-16
Is it normal to wait 18 days for AE recommendation?
AMG铭 2022-06-10
Share your submission process:
November 10, 2021: Initial draft submitted
February 11, 2022: First revision, major revisions given by the editor, reviewed by 5 referees
March 10, 2022: Received first round of revision comments
April 25, 2022: Accepted.
海阔天空520 2022-06-10
Because I was waiting for publication, I occasionally observed how many articles were not yet published before my early access article. According to my statistical analysis, TIE publishes over 1,000 papers each year, with approximately 110 newly accepted papers entering early access each month. This number is quite stable, which may suggest that TIE accepts papers in batches. You must stand out in the final version of that batch to have a chance of being accepted! This may explain why some people have gone through several rounds of revisions and still end up being rejected. Therefore, the "awaiting eic decision" stage in the final round is quite nerve-wracking. I waited for 10 days before being accepted!
ENDIT 2022-06-10
Today I received the job offer notification. The overall submission process is as follows:
First review, two months. Major revisions were given. One month later, it was sent back for revisions.
Second review, 46 days, minor revisions were suggested. There were no major issues, and it was returned after two days of modifications.
Third review, 27 days, and the acceptance notification was sent.
Overall, it feels smooth. The reviewers, associate editor, and editor-in-chief also provided timely notifications.
The overall timeline adds up to half a year, which is indeed a bit long. It's really nice to receive the job offer before graduation.
墨素 2022-06-07
Do you need to attach an author's biography and photo after the main text when submitting for the first time?
ENDIT 2022-06-06
My brother, my "awaiting eic decision" status has been going on for 6 days now. I have nothing else to say, just laughing it off.
帝鎷 2022-06-06
It has been eight days already.
Is it this slow now?
帝鎷 2022-06-01
变成Awaiting AE Recommendation translates to "Changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation" in English.
ENDIT 2022-05-31
So what is the standard for verifying if there is an actual experiment?
清晨看露 2022-05-30
I clearly conducted actual experiments, why does the editor-in-chief still claim that I did not conduct actual experiments???? Is there any solution for this situation?
As stated on the ScholarOne Manuscripts (S1M) login page of the TIE and on the journal's website, papers without experimental verification are immediately rejected without being sent for review. Since your paper lacks experimental verification, it has been rejected for this reason. TIE strongly insists on real experiments. If a dataset is used, it must be generated by the authors through actual experiments.
ENDIT 2022-05-20
It is estimated that there is a huge volume of submissions at the current stage, and the processing speed is somewhat slow.
清晨看露 2022-05-19
I have been waiting for almost half a month in EIC's hands, and they haven't submitted my work for review yet.
唐牛才是食神 2022-05-19
How long have you been at EIC, WoC?
Zoomxxx 2022-05-11
4.6 has passed and still hasn't come back. I don't know how much longer I have to wait.
Kacjer 2022-05-10
The sibling issue is not a big problem, very stable.
笨柳 2022-05-10
The term "awaiting" means to be waiting for something or someone.
笨柳 2022-05-10
en attente
piggy_one 2022-05-10
What Wu said is reasonable. TIE indeed cannot compete in the field of robotics. I saw some path planning work on it before, and it was simply appalling.
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started