ydan 2022-12-22

This journal is good, and it is expected to have an impact factor of over 9 next year. This can be easily determined, with a capital letter of F.

juice77 2022-12-22

Similar experiences,
Upon closer inspection, many new publications this year are in the fourth district,
Even "One Earth Nature Cancer" new publications are categorized in the second and third districts. It is difficult to determine the quality. ?

栓扣 2022-12-22

投Matter，让转投Cell Reports Physical Science。同意转投然后给我拒了让我再转投Iscience。现在想想还好给我拒了，中了可就麻烦了。

Submit to Matter, then transfer submission to Cell Reports Physical Science. Agreed to transfer but got rejected, so let me transfer again to Iscience. Now I realize it's good that I got rejected, otherwise it would have been troublesome if it got accepted.

远哥每天都超帅 2022-12-22

Wow, it's amazing. It's settled in District 4. I never expected that. It's a very good job. Well, investment needs caution.

laomai 2022-12-21

Excited, the division of Chinese Academy of Sciences changes every year. Maybe next year it will become the top division.

yooooshi 2022-12-21

The impact factor of the new publication is placed in the fourth quartile in its first year, which is not surprising.

向上的纸飞机 2022-12-21

This comment has been deleted.

碧海蓝天WGP 2022-12-21

Can you please help me check the remote sensing area? Thank you very much.

未来的院士 2022-12-21

Today the zones have been divided, and there are now four zones, hahaha. The investment failed 55555.

King Baum 2022-12-18

The timely impact factor is 7.5.

King Baum 2022-11-24

The timely impact factor is 7.0.

DrZJU 2022-11-23

投Matter被拒，建议转投CRPS
Rejected by Matter, it is suggested to submit to CRPS.

8.16 Transferred for submission.
9.21 Returned for major revisions, with four reviewers, three provided more positive feedback, and one had more negative feedback.
10.13 Revised and returned, with one round of re-review, during which the status alternated between "under review" and "reviewers complete."
11.9 Received feedback (pre-acceptance), the fourth reviewer rejected it, while the first three agreed to accept it. After considering the editor's opinion, it was given a pre-acceptance, but the issues raised by the fourth reviewer still need to be addressed. After formatting, it was returned on 11.17.
11.23 Accepted.

juice77 2022-11-18

Today, the Chinese Academy of Sciences is divided into major categories, comprehensive categories, and unknown categories. The competition is fierce.

咸鱼干 2022-11-08

Joule's second review was rejected, so it was submitted to another journal for direct consideration. The editor will communicate carefully to refine the content of the manuscript. It is unclear about the future development of the journal. Due to the nature of the field, personally, I don't think the impact factor is very important. I hope the influence can be effectively utilized.

wisdom46056098 2022-11-05

Very good journal, the reviewers' comments are very accurate, and the processing speed is also very fast. Looking forward to further development!

laomai 2022-11-04

As of today, 6.5.

HAHA哈哈哈 2022-11-02

I understand this student, Joule, very well. It is perfectly normal for the editor to personally write a letter rejecting the submission with emotions involved. All articles are the result of hard work, and it is frustrating to encounter unreasonable reviewers. I hope the article finds its most suitable place. Best wishes!

laomai 2022-10-17

According to the current development trend, it is highly likely that around November next year.

King Baum 2022-10-14

The timely impact factor is 6.0.

yooooshi 2022-09-08

Just a pure speculation, I would guess around IF12 next year based on my experience.

laomai 2022-09-07

The statistics of citation information have a lag, which is why the impact factor for the previous year is only announced in June each year. As a reference, the real-time impact factor for last year exceeded 5 around November 27th.

岳麓山摸鱼大师 2022-09-06

It's already September, with an instantaneous impact factor of 5. It feels difficult to reach 10. Is there still 3 months left?

+和+ 2022-09-05

Next year, breaking the 10 mark is without suspense. Matter 2 is positive 1 negative. It is recommended to transfer to CRPS and enjoy a 100% discount on the page fee. After modification, it will be directly accepted.

半π 2022-08-27

USD5200 This is so expensive!

岳麓山摸鱼大师 2022-08-26

I would like to ask, what is the current impact factor of this journal for this year?

apollotyq 2022-08-17

According to the Cell's submission policy, they generally do not accept substantial revisions in the third round, which may be the reason for the editor's rejection. It is likely that the author mainly stumbled upon the first-round reviewer, who probably had the most negative opinion. Of course, the editor can choose to accept the manuscript based on their own judgement, but this time they chose to respect the reviewer's opinion.

GGGuan丶 2022-08-16

I have a relatively positive view of this journal and have high hopes for its impact factor to exceed 10. However, my personal experience with submitting a manuscript was not good. I received the decision of the second round of review on the same day, which caused me to explode emotionally, so I came here to vent. Afterwards, I realized that there would definitely be people who would criticize me, and accidentally seeing their comments inevitably affected my mood, but I couldn't find a way to delete the comments.

Regarding my submission, I initially submitted to Joule and went through two revisions before it was rejected. The editor of Cell Reports Physical Science sent me an email invitation to transfer my submission, expressing interest in the content of my paper and promising it would be 100% free. They also mentioned that the paper could be pre-accepted or at most sent back to one reviewer for a second review. However, the paper was directly sent back to the original three reviewers. After waiting for two months, the paper was accepted by the other reviewers, but one reviewer still had concerns and the editor rejected it directly.

Perhaps many people would think this is normal. I now realize that I was quite out of control at the time and felt pigeonholed. I couldn't help but react in the moment. I still need to continue cultivating my own mentality.

yooooshi 2022-08-13

Laughing to death, even rejected manuscripts can be used to criticize. Does switching journals guarantee acceptance?

GGGuan丶 2022-08-10

The internet is truly a place of controversy.

未来的院士 2022-08-07

I said you haven't recovered, but you insisted on being discharged. It's because I was too soft-hearted that now I wonder where you are, the hospital will send a car to pick you up.