大爷的猫 2022-01-15

Received at Editorial Office, 26 Aug 2021 -> This text means that the document was received by the Editorial Office on August 26, 2021.

Decision, 15 Oct 2021 -> This text indicates that a decision was made on October 15, 2021.

Submit, 28 Nov 2021 -> This text signifies that a submission was made on November 28, 2021.

Decision, 06 Dec 2021 -> This text suggests that a decision was made on December 6, 2021.

Submit, 12 Jan 2022 -> This text states that a submission was made on January 12, 2022.

Article accepted for publication, 15 Jan 2022 -> This text conveys that the article was accepted for publication on January 15, 2022.

SCIs accepted 2022-01-12

2022.1.22 Received the second EP. Thank you, Hefa Cheng, Ph.D. Overall, the review process was quite fast. All three reviewers provided constructive comments, and the revisions were also done diligently. Keep up the good work!

zzzzhao 2021-12-30

2021.10.18 submitted to journal
2021.11.07 request to revise pre review
2021.11.18 under review
2021.12.11 major revision - 3 reviewers, 1 direct acceptance, 1 minor revision suggestion, 2 positive evaluations, 1 rejection, editor requested major revision. Although one reviewer rejected the paper, we replied to him with several pages to clarify the importance of our work, mainly to let the editor see our attitude.
2021.12.17 resubmitted to journal
2021.12.20 under review
2021.12.29 accepted - It took longer due to the Christmas holiday, otherwise the result might have come faster. However, we managed to achieve a breakthrough in this direction of personal review with zero, which makes me very happy. Let's continue working hard and good luck to everyone!

zf519 2021-12-28

12.27 accepted

菜狗小弟弟 2021-12-19

When will the original data be uploaded, please?

浒 2021-12-16

May I ask what journal EP refers to?

zf519 2021-12-07

Update, there was another major revision on October 30th. All the previous major comments have been resolved. This time, the focus is mainly on improving expressions and redrawing a few figures. I don't know where the editor found such an amazing peer reviewer to arbitrate. They helped with every sentence, even recommending the best and most recent references to cite.

定风波 2021-11-26

The following text has undergone changes in status during my submission process:

2021.9.14 submitted
2021.9.16 with editor
2021.9.19 under review
2021.10.6 Required Reviews Completed
2021.10.7 major revise
2021.10.22 With Editor
2021.11.13 Under Review
2021.11.21 Required Reviews Completed
2021.11.25 Accepted

Overall, the review process has been quite fast.

chongdong 2021-11-26

This luck is too bad, right?

SCIs accepted 2021-11-20

Nov 05, 2021 Submission
Nov 09, 2021 Under Review (Resubmitted once during this period)

线虫是我祖宗 2021-11-19

Yes, all four reviewers provided comments, and one of them consistently felt that my experimental dosage was too high and unrelated to environmental exposure.

临月二九 2021-11-19

Was it rejected after major revisions? Are there any reasons for the rejection?

线虫是我祖宗 2021-11-19

8.6 submit to the journal
8.7 with editor
8.9 under review
8.31 Required Review Completed
9.2 under review
9.3 Major Revision
10.8 With editor
10.10 under review
10.25 Required Review Completed
10.25 under review
10.26 Required Review Completed
10.26 under review
11.10 Decision in Process
11.11 Reject

临月二九 2021-11-16

Published online one week after receiving, quickly.

llxaky 2021-11-13

Oh my, you stepped on it so hard, _(¦3」∠)_

临月二九 2021-11-10

The first SCI paper for my Master's degree was initially submitted to JHM. However, it was rejected due to a high similarity index and the editor refused to accept it even after revisions. Therefore, I resubmitted it to EP. It took a whole 4 months from submission to acceptance. I am very grateful to editor Wen Chen and I wish EP continued success!

临月二九 2021-11-09

7.9 submit to journal
7.12 with editor
7.15 under review
9.21 required reviews completed
9.24 major revision
10.24 resubmit
10.25 with editor
10.26 under review
11.9 required reviews completed
11.9 accept

Translation:
7.9: Submitted to the journal
7.12: Under the editor's evaluation
7.15: Under review
9.21: Required reviews completed
9.24: Major revision requested
10.24: Resubmitted
10.25: Under the editor's evaluation
10.26: Under review
11.9: Required reviews completed
11.9: Accepted

zf519 2021-11-09

I have submitted several times and summarized the experience. EP and STOTEN are different. All manuscripts need to be submitted to the editor-in-chief first, who will conduct an initial review before assigning them to the associate editor. The option to choose an editor in the submission system is basically useless. I have submitted several times, but none of them were assigned to the chosen editor. For other journals, the assignment of reviewers depends on the editor's mood. If there is no arbitration in the initial review of EP, there will be three reviewers. After receiving the third review report, the status will change from "under review" to "required reviews completed". The first review usually takes about 1-2 months. The editor's handling efficiency is relatively high, and any delays in the process are usually due to the reviewers. Technical testing is not required for revisions. The revised manuscript will be sent directly to the editor, without the status of "submitted to journal". Each time a revised manuscript is submitted to the editor, the "with editor" time will change, indicating that the editor has read it, agreed to send it for review, and then handed it over to the original associate editor.

临月二九 2021-11-09

My application is also under review. Hopefully, we will both receive good news.

zf519 2021-11-09

Still under review, but the editor's efficiency is very high, and it was submitted for review the next day.

临月二九 2021-11-08

Is there any news?

zl 2021-11-03

2021.8.17 submitted
2021.9.14 major revision by 3 reviewers. All three reviewers found the paper interesting. One reviewer provided 20 comments, including rewriting the introduction, separating the results and discussion, and pointing out grammar issues. The other two reviewers gave fewer suggestions, mainly related to formatting, which required significant revisions from the editor. After carefully incorporating the suggestions, the article improved significantly. This journal is really fast, which is great. Thanks to the editor and reviewers.
2021. 10.26 resubmitted to journal
2021. 11.2 accepted

zf519 2021-11-01

This manuscript was initially submitted to WR, but after two major revisions, it was rejected by the editor and then submitted to EP.

zf519 2021-11-01

2021.6.21 submitted to journal
2021.6.24 under review
2021.7.24 major revision: 3 reviewers, 1 accepted with language polishing, 1 minor revision with high praise, 1 rejection with major revisions suggested by the editor
2021.8.17 resubmitted to journal
2021.9.8 major revision: Editor took caution and invited a fourth reviewer who suggested major revisions. The feedback was very positive, with several "interesting" comments in the general comments section.
2021.11.1 resubmitted to journal hoping for good luck.

lfx 2021-10-28

Two major revisions were made, the first time with three experts and the second time with one expert. After submitting the revised manuscript for the second time, it was rejected after one month, taking a total of eleven months. It was incredibly slow and frustrating!

SCIs accepted 2021-10-22

2021.4.30 submitted to journal
2021.5.25 major revision (3 reviewers, 2 minor revisions, 1 major revision)
2021.7.6 revision submitted to journal
2021.7.21 accepted
Thank you very much to Bernd Nowack, the editor of the Master's research on soil remediation. He was very diligent and responsible in handling the manuscript, and the processing was very fast. I remember that it was accepted within a few days. The return of the manuscript was also quick. The influence of EP has been steadily increasing in recent years, making it a good choice for submission. I wish the journal continued success.

just11 2021-10-21

7.14 submit - Submitted on July 14th
7.15 with editor - Under review by editor on July 15th
7.18 under review - Under review on July 18th
8.19 major revision - Requires major revision by author on August 19th
9.12 resubmit - Resubmitted on September 12th
9.12 with editor - Under review by editor on September 12th
9.18 under review - Under review on September 18th
10.10 accept - Accepted on October 10th

navy0415 2021-10-13

6.14 submit
6.19 Request to Revise pre review
6.25 resubmit
6.29 under review
7.29 under review
8.25 major revision
9.15 resub
10.6 major revision
10.11 resubmit
10.12 accept

Editor Admir Créso Targino is very professional and works extremely fast. The quality of the article significantly improved after the modifications!

kingsley 2021-10-08

June 15, 2021 Submit
July 26, 2021 Major Revision
September 8, 2021 Submit
September 29, 2021 Minor Revision
October 3, 2021 Submit
October 4, 2021 Accept

The reviewer's comments were very professional. They requested additional experiments that addressed the pain points of the research topic. After incorporating these changes, the quality of the article improved further. Grateful!

kalozong 2021-10-03

How many reviewers are there? What does the change in Under Review date mean?