xingkei 2022-03-07

Jan 11, 2022 Initial Date Submitted
Mar 02, 2022 Required Reviews Completed

梦不到的刀塔 2022-03-07

Will there be any new reviewers added after the minor revisions?

QAQAQA 2022-03-06

I want to ask the original poster how many reviewers there are? Is it the same voice?

QAQAQA 2022-03-06

Brother, how many reviewers are you? "Under review" has changed so many times.

kydog 2022-03-04

2020.10.9 Submitted
10.27 Under Review
11.12 Under Review Date Change
2021.2.8 Major Revision
3.18 Returned
4.5 Under Review
5.6 Under Review
6.15 Under Review
7.5 Under Review
7.16 Under Review
8.31 Under Review
10.4 Minor Revision
10.18 Revised and Returned
10.21 Under Review
2022.1.4 Minor Revision
1.12 Returned
1.30 Under Review Date Change
2.8 Under Review Date Change
3.1 Accepted
Lasted for 17 months...

QAQAQA 2022-03-03

2022.1.26 submit
2022.2.28 under review (dates changed 4 times during this period)

跑哥 2022-02-01

The submission was reviewed by five reviewers twice. The review process took eight months, and after one reminder, it went through a major revision and a minor revision before finally being accepted.

zack puth 2022-02-01

The journals under IFAC provide professional reviews, but the speed is slightly slow, and I always have to send emails to urge for the review;
First submission: Two reviewers provided nearly 50 review comments in total, which greatly helped improve the quality of the article;
Second submission: After supplementing some proofs in the revised manuscript, it was accepted;
Hope the journal will continue to improve!

努力发SCI的东 2022-01-27

Update, happy new year to my family, good luck and great prosperity! Hope to have a good start!

xusita 2022-01-25

To supplement the follow-up, the revised manuscript was successfully accepted after one month. The process with the editor took about two weeks, possibly due to the impact of the Christmas holiday.

xusita 2021-12-16

2021.7.30 Submitted
2021.10.20 Minor Revision
2021.12.15 Revision Submitted
Three reviewers, two provided some minor suggestions, the second reviewer provided over 20 comments, but they were all minor issues. Overall, the submission experience was good.

hsk 2021-12-08

2020.7, submission;
2021.9, received first round comments, which were not very strict, and included some discussions and analysis;
2021.11.26, submitted revised manuscript;
2021.12.8, currently under review.
I don't want to talk about the first round review. I feel like the second round review will also take a long time???

walet 2021-12-08

Unbelievable, by the time I saw it, your article was already submitted after mine... It's been four months and I haven't heard anything. I asked once and they said one reviewer has submitted their feedback, but the other one hasn't yet... The topic is too niche. Oh my, if they want to reject me, they should do it quickly.

zfw 2021-12-05

Is the original poster already hired directly? Impossible, right?

jairy 2021-12-04

The sky has turned pale, and the speed of the original poster is too fast. It's truly enviable.

努力发SCI的东 2021-12-03

There should be 6, the reviewer numbers are 1, 4, and 6. The number of manuscripts this year is too large. If it was last year, it might have required major revisions. I can only say that we have encountered such a situation where Chinese people torment Chinese people. Others use GitHub, but their link opens Baidu cloud. However, the article does have problems. If a high-quality journal rejects it, it is definitely our own problem. But his own article falls far short of his requirements, so he is just saying a lot. You should believe in yourselves, and I will come back again!

zfw 2021-12-03

Both of them agreed, it's just that one of them was long-winded and got rejected. Is it so strict? I'm scared. So, you mean there are three reviewers?

努力发SCI的东 2021-12-02

The speed is very fast. I was rejected today, but it's not a loss. It was my first experience submitting to a top journal, and I feel it went alright. Two reviewers supported publication while one suggested a redesign of the experiment, leading to rejection by the editor. Although it is regrettable, one of the reviewers provided a three-page response, guiding me to supplement the experiment. What more could I ask for? Maybe that reviewer was a bit unfair, as he recommended the latest algorithm on GitHub, even though his own articles cannot compare. Nevertheless, he made an effort to provide me with revision suggestions, and I am very grateful to him!

hsk 2021-12-02

Are you still in a rush? After 14 months of review, the first-round comments were returned. Just last week, it was sent back for revisions and is now "Under Review" again, waiting for the results...

努力发SCI的东 2021-12-01

2021/12/01 Decision in Process - Make a big repair or a small repair! Please give me a modification! I beg you!

sunset 2021-12-01

The original text appears to be written in a mix of Chinese and English languages. However, here's the translation of the text into English:

"The speed of the original poster's submission and acceptance is so fast. May I ask how long it takes from 'with editor' to 'under review'? Do you go directly from 'with editor' to 'under editor evaluation'? How many reviewers are usually involved? Thank you."

努力发SCI的东 2021-11-30

Submitted in September, reviewed in 6 days, and required reviews completed has been ongoing for over a month now. Does anyone have a similar situation like this? Are journal review processes getting slower?

zfw 2021-11-26

Same with the editor. A few days later than you submitted. It took a week to submit to the editor. It has been 10 days with the editor.

Kevin-Lee 2021-11-26

9th submission, still with the editor today, the 26th.

zfw 2021-11-23

Kevin-Lee, hello, are you still with the editor? Why does it feel like this journal is so slow?

Kevin-Lee 2021-11-19

Submitted on November 9th, assigned a reference number on the same day, it has been 10 days and it is still "with editor" now.

zfw 2021-11-17

After 5 days, finally with the editor. Judging from the assigned numbers, it feels like there are already over 3000 articles this year. Usually, only around 300 are accepted each year. The chances seem really slim. What do you all think? Also, how long did it take for everyone to be with the editor?

南溪子 2021-11-16

My article has been submitted for over six months now, but there has been no response. I have already sent two reminders, so I feel reluctant to send another one.

北月 2021-11-15

For the direction of speech/deep learning, this is the direct approach.

zfw 2021-11-14

It has been a long time since I submitted to the journal, and I also want to urge them to review my manuscript. How long is the normal wait time? Do all journals require urging to speed up the process?