没事吧 2022-12-06

9.19 Submission
11.20 I have been editing it all this time and sent an email to urge once.
12.6 The editor directly rejected it without review and suggested that I submit it to the Fourth District Corrosion Engineering Science and Technology.
Hmm, I don't know if my own level is not enough, but the initial review is really slow.

小博 2022-12-04

It's almost been two months, still with the editor.

小博 2022-11-29

On November 25th, I reminded about the manuscript, but I haven't received any response.

小博 2022-11-29

It has been over a month and a half since submission, and it is still "with editor." If it continues to be delayed, it will be Christmas soon. I estimate that I will have to wait until January for the review.

科研废柴 2022-11-23

Translated text: This review process is a bit slow, I don't know why.

ZZUO 2022-11-19

Yes, the editor approached many people, but only one person agreed. The reviewer was quite pleasant, and the process was very fast.

Mr Rong 2022-11-15

2022-11-11 avec l'éditeur translates to "2022-11-11 with the editor" in English.

Mr Rong 2022-11-10

Just submitted, hoping for a smooth submission.

yanyan 2022-11-06

Excuse me, did you only receive the opinion of one reviewer from the first trial to acceptance?

yanyan 2022-11-06

Excuse me, is your submission still with the editor?

小博 2022-10-27

It has been half a month with the editor, can I request for the manuscript?

金陵砍柴人 2022-10-20

@Feng Xicao, my editor is d.j.young.
@Xiao Bo, it took me a month and a half for the first reminder, and I used an online template for the reminder letter. If it has only been eight days, I suggest you wait a little longer.

风兮草 2022-10-19

We'll know once the feedback for the repair is received.

小博 2022-10-19

May I ask how to see who the editor is?

小博 2022-10-19

It has been 9 days, and I am still with the editor. Should I remind them to submit the manuscript?

小博 2022-10-19

Hello OP, may I ask if you sent a reminder to the editor after 8 days when you first submitted your work? How do you usually remind them for the submission?

小博 2022-10-19

October 9th, submitted;
October 10th, with editor.

calmesummer 2022-10-19

It has been two months with the editor, is this normal? Should I withdraw the submission?

风兮草 2022-10-15

Who is the responsible editor for your manuscript?

ZZUO 2022-09-30

Posted on July 9th, it took a month and a half to be reviewed. I reminded them once after a month. I advise all my friends not to worry, personally, I think if it's not reviewed, it will be rejected quickly. The editor is Young and invited multiple reviewers, but only one agreed to review it, and they returned with feedback in two weeks. The feedback was not extensive, and no additional experiments were needed. It took a little over two weeks to make revisions. It was submitted for review the next day, and surprisingly, the reviewer completed the review in just one day, and it was accepted two days later. There are too few good journals that accept materials degradation, I hope the journal of corrosion science continues to improve.

金陵砍柴人 2022-09-18

2022 6.13 Submit
2022 6.13 With editor
2022 6.21 With editor
Two reminders during the period
2022 8.04 Under Review
2022 9.06 Revise
2022 9.15 With Editor
2022 9.18 Accept

fendoufendou 2022-09-11

It took 4 and a half months, and the submission was sent for review on the same afternoon. After more than a month, feedback on revisions was given. It took two months to make the revisions, and another month for minor revisions after the revised manuscript was reviewed. It was accepted for publication three days after the final revision was submitted. The research was done by a master's student and published in a top journal in the corrosion field. Thanks to Zhang for the efficient work in editing!

leiph123 2022-08-31

In your situation, it should be submitted for review, so wait for it. The erosion of science is very slow.

yanyan 2022-08-29

Great master, I would like to ask you a question. There is an article on liquid metal corrosion that I would like to submit to CS. The time with the editor is quite long, around January, which is well known for this journal. However, I heard that if the article is rejected, it will be done within a week. Is it reliable to believe that articles with longer editor time have already been sent for review?

ZZUO 2022-08-26

How did you request the manuscript? Did you request it twice through the "send email" option on the submission interface? It has been one and a half months since I submitted, and it is still "with editor." I requested once after one month through the "send email" option on the submission interface, and the staff at Aesville replied that they had reminded the editor. However, I haven't received any response so far, and the status is still "with editor." Sigh, I have never encountered such a slow journal before.

leiph123 2022-08-13

Top journals in the field of corrosion, unrivaled, this is my second article. Especially in the corrosion of metals, this journal is unparalleled, with a great reputation. The peer reviewers in the field of metals are all experts. The peer review process is extremely strict, with two reviewers for the first review, and the review is extremely meticulous and serious. They carefully read every sentence and provide feedback. I have never seen reviewers being so meticulous. The revision process was extremely demanding. The review process was slow, and it took six months to be accepted. If you care about speed, it's better not to submit.

金陵砍柴人 2022-08-04

The second reminder for submission, it was finally sent for review on August 4th.

金陵砍柴人 2022-07-27

@普通梦想家 What is your current status? Have you changed journals for submission?

普通梦想家 2022-07-23

@Do you want to submit for a specific category? Have you sent it for review?

普通梦想家 2022-07-23

Like you, I have been unsuccessful in urging for the manuscript, and even those who submitted their manuscripts a month after me have already been sent for review. I will not easily consider computer science in the future.