认证评论 - Construction and Building Materials
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

小布ヘ 2022-12-21

I, a master's student, now have two papers published in the first district of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Although the journal in the first district is a bit less prestigious, it feels a bit like a fluke.

小布ヘ 2022-12-21

I returned to the first district of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, great news.

浮生若梦 2022-12-18

12.17accept No editing or review was submitted, directly hired

hedgeforward 2022-12-18

May I ask if the email was sent through the submission system or via regular email?

小布ヘ 2022-12-18

I submitted two articles.
The first one was submitted on July 30th and accepted on September 7th, with a total of three reviewers.
The second one was submitted on October 17th and accepted on December 13th, with a total of two reviewers.
It feels like there are a lot of submissions towards the end of the year, so the progress might be slower, but overall it is still fast.
This journal is good in every aspect, except for the high self-citation rate... They should take care of it quickly, otherwise, there might be problems...

3篇Sci 2022-12-17

Oh, I see. It took me three months to find a reviewer, and I have already received the review comments. I don't know when I can find another reviewer.

3篇Sci 2022-12-17

It's not certain. It depends on the speed of the editor and the reviewer. Some are fast, while others are slow.

LUXIXIXI 2022-12-16

May I ask everyone if the initial review time for this journal is two months for "under review"?

Tsolmon 2022-12-16

In my first review, there was only one reviewer's opinion (the second reviewer withheld their feedback on my article for 8 months without returning it, and the editor proceeded with revisions without waiting for their input). During the second review, when I was making revisions, the editor found a new reviewer and said that the article must undergo review by two reviewers. Finally, it was accepted.

Tsolmon 2022-12-16

Maybe review the situation every three weeks or so, and the under review date will change once.

3篇Sci 2022-12-16

I want to ask if there is only one reviewer, is it the one who finally accepts it?

LUXIXIXI 2022-12-15

But the time has changed many times.

LucioZ 2022-12-14

2022/11/25 Under Review
2022/12/14 Under Review as below,
Review completed: 1
Review invitations accepted: 1
Review invitations sent: 2+ (3-4 updates for this invitation)
Over~~`

Translation: The text is already in English and does not require translation.

LUXIXIXI 2022-12-13

Why does the initial review time change?

2022-12-13

December 13th, Accept is finished! This time also took more than two months! Lucky!

daigua-xin 2022-12-13

October 20th - Submitted
October 22nd - With editor
October 26th - Under review
October 31st - A reviewer has agreed to review
November 1st - A reviewer has agreed to review
November 8th - A reviewer has agreed to review
November 8th - A reviewer has agreed to review
November 21st - RRC (Reviewers' Report Completed)
November 30th - Revise
December 9th - Resubmit
December 12th - 3 reviewers have agreed to review
December 13th - 1 reviewer has agreed to review
December 13th - RRC (Reviewers' Report Completed)

3篇Sci 2022-12-12

Admiration. Submitted in September and until now only one reviewer has accepted it. It hasn't been reviewed yet.

2022-12-11

December 11th RRC

Tsolmon 2022-12-08

I reviewed for 8 months during the first round, and for the second round, I found two new reviewers.

2022-12-07

Check in the manuscript tracking system to see if it is because there is no reviewer's approval for the review. Normally, as long as there is a reviewer for the review, the speed of this journal is still very fast. If there is no reviewer accepting the review and ignoring the reminder letter, then write directly to the editor-in-chief. The CBM official website has the editor-in-chief's email. Generally, the editor-in-chief is more responsible than the junior editors.

caicai3256 2022-12-07

It has been 5 months already, buddy. Don't think about it anymore, this journal is too slow.

灰灰 2022-12-06

It has been nearly 40 days, and there is still no movement with the editor.

浮生若梦 2022-12-03

It has been a month, still working with the editor, and pushing for the manuscript hasn't been effective. I'm exhausted. I don't know what to do.

布呐呐 2022-11-29

2023/01/14
review completed: 1
review invitations accepted: 1
review invitations sent: 2+

2023/02/09
ACCEPT
Lasted 105 days, accepted.

caicai3256 2022-11-29

It has been five months and it is still in the first trial.

2022-11-28

You can prompt it. If not, write a letter directly to the editor-in-chief. It may be because there is no reviewer for the review, which is why it is so slow.

ssssssaaa 2022-11-28

Does anyone have this situation? It has been 7 months and we are still in the first trial.

2022-11-28

November 28th Under Review

2022-11-26

November 27th With Editor (R1)

3篇Sci 2022-11-26

I haven't found a reviewer yet, even though I submitted it earlier than you.

Add your recorded webinar

Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.

Upload Now

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now