认证评论 - Chemosphere
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。

NAGGNA 2021-11-10

During the month of waiting for the manuscript review, I came here every day to read everyone's experiences and received great motivation. I thought about sharing my own experience after acceptance.
20210924 submitted to journal
20211003 under review
20211107 minor revision

Augen 2021-11-10

Thank you, Enric Brillas, very fast speed.

大王叫我来巡山 2021-11-05

May I ask who is the editor? Thank you!

yuxy 2021-10-26

2021.06.15 submitted to journal
2021.06.16 editor assigned
2021.07.05 under review
2021.07.06 under review
2021.08.08 with editor
2021.08.21 major revision
Three reviewers, comments are mostly positive
2021.09.02 revision submitted to journal
2021.09.26 under review
2021.10.24 accept
Second article in chemosphere, this time the editor is relatively slow, usually takes about two weeks to handle, but fortunately the results are good
Recommend Yeomin Yoon as editor, very fast in handling, colleagues in the relevant field can consider

西风 2021-10-22

2021.07.19 - submitted to journal
2021.07.26 - editor assigned
2021.07.29 - with editor
2021.08.02 - under review
2021.10.15 - minor revision
2021.10.17 - revision submitted to journal
2021.10.22 - accept

编辑部一轮游 2021-10-20

7.03 Submission
7.12 Under review
8.13 Major revision (two major revisions and one minor revision, the minor revision was done by an Indian, who provided 20 references for me to cite, and I ended up citing 8)
9.09 Revised version submitted
9.13 With editor
9.27 Accepted (both the first and second reviewers agreed, the third reviewer did not review, causing a significant delay)
9.28 Online
Everything went smoothly, except I personally delayed the process and the revisions took longer than expected, which left the Indian reviewer speechless.

Augen 2021-10-20

9.09 Submission
9.13 Under review
10.11 Minor revision
10.19 With editor
10.20 Accepted

ABCLY 2021-10-19

I have also been editing and assigning tasks all along, feeling so anxious. I am busy with graduation, sigh.

Faheem 2021-10-19

This journal is considered to be of high quality and has achieved a Q1 ranking globally, but it is still only recognized as Q2 in our specific region. It is necessary to update and align with the standards followed worldwide, which includes updating several other journals as well. This situation can be disheartening for our own scientists.

naruto016 2021-10-19

The request says that there must be a picture summary, right? If there is none, it can be added after the review.

大王叫我来巡山 2021-10-18

May I ask everyone if it is possible to not include a graphic abstract if it is not originally provided? Although the journal does not require it, many accepted papers seem to have a graphic abstract.

ABCLY 2021-10-16

Original: 楼主,现在怎么样了?什么流程了?谢谢

Translation: OP, how are you doing now? What is the current process? Thank you.

小朵玫瑰 2021-10-13

Submitted for review three days later, returned after one month.
Made some changes and resubmitted, accepted the next day!
Haha, feels like the process was quite fast, and the submission experience was very good~
Thanks to the boss, thanks to the editor, thanks to the reviewers~
This journal is indeed quite fast, the editor is very efficient, hope it continues to improve~

Yzyefan 2021-10-12

Hello, may I ask how long it took for you to receive the acceptance email and have the publication displayed online?

Yzyefan 2021-10-12

Hello, may I ask how long it took for you to receive, accept, edit, and publish the manuscript for the publication after receiving the email?

白天er 2021-10-09

As of 31st, the status has remained "editor assigned".

Gan 2021-10-08

8.12 submitted
8.13 with editor
8.15 editor assigned
8.15 reviewer(s) invited
8.16 under review
8.16 reviewer(s) invited
8.18 under review
8.22 under review
8.22 with editor
9.01 with editor
9.10 revise major revision (Reviewer #2 to #7, someone refused and the editor added another invitation)
9.24 revise submitted (several dozen comments in total, response is over 7000 words, fortunately no need for additional experiments)
9.24 with editor
9.27 editor assigned
9.27 reviewer(s) invited
9.27 under review
9.28 with editor
9.29 under review
9.30 with editor
9.30 under review
10.4 with editor
10.8 accepted

空军总教头 2021-10-08

34 days, still editor assigned.

深海鳕鱼子 2021-10-06

From the end of August until now, it has been more than 40 days since the reviewer(s) were invited. It's frustrating, I don't know why it's taking so long.

小小叮当 2021-09-30

It's normal, I also waited for two to three months before receiving the results of the major repair. It took more than 20 days to make the changes before it was returned.

是非得失 2021-09-28

I have been submitting for a month, but still going crazy with the editor.

Lingshuai Zeng 2021-09-28

20210707 submit - Submitted on July 7, 2021.
20210709 editor assigned - Editor assigned on July 9, 2021.
20210716 reject because of more than 5 co-authors - Rejected on July 16, 2021, due to having more than 5 co-authors.
20210717 resubmit - Resubmitted on July 17, 2021.
20210719 editor assigned - Editor assigned on July 19, 2021.
20210719 reviewer invited - Reviewer invited on July 19, 2021.
20210720 under review - Under review as of July 20, 2021.
20210720 reviewer invited - Reviewer invited on July 20, 2021.
20210721 under review - Under review as of July 21, 2021.
20210722 under review - Under review as of July 22, 2021.
20210821 with editor - With editor as of August 21, 2021.
20210824 moderate revision - Moderately revised on August 24, 2021.
20210923 revision submit - Revision submitted on September 23, 2021.
20210928 accept - Accepted on September 28, 2021.

木子星 2021-09-28

At the end of April, I submitted it and went back and forth with different reviewers. There were major revisions, but they were all just changes to the text. It was accepted at the end of August, just 4 months. Upon reviewing it again, I still found many grammar errors and such, minor flaws that made me feel uneasy. Sigh... Oh well, a young calf isn't afraid of tigers. It was my first time submitting to a SCI journal, and I lacked experience, so there were various small issues. But I am grateful to the editors and reviewers, even though it took a long time, the experience was very valuable. I'm about to submit my second paper soon.

空军总教头 2021-09-28

Ah, flipping through this, my emotions are complicated. These editors are silly. At the very least, give me a proper answer. I've been eating for free, can't you do something about it? It's been almost a month since I submitted mine, and it's still waiting to be assigned to an editor.

上辈子是数学题 2021-09-27

I also took about 10 days to submit for review, and it is still related to the editor.

空军总教头 2021-09-26

3 weeks or editor allocation.

空军总教头 2021-09-22

It has been two weeks, but still editor assigned. The pressure of graduation is too great.

那又怎样 2021-09-18

The current state, which is unfamiliar, is called "editor assigned" and is not the regular "with editor".

zhangxiaojing 2021-09-18

2021.06.18~ Submitted
2021.06.19~2021.06.24 Editor Assigned
2021.06.24~ Under Review
2021.07.18~ Major Revision
2021.08.26~2021.08.30 With Editor
2021.08.30~2021.09.18 Under Review
2021.09.18 Accept

槐花开在北极 2021-09-08

7.5 Submission Allocation
7.9 Under Review
8.2 Major Revision
9.5 Resubmission
9.6 Accepted
Overall, the process was quite fast. The review took one month, and I was given 40 days for revisions. However, there was another paper that needed major revisions, which caused a delay. Otherwise, it could have been even faster.

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started